A comparative study on early versus conventional feeding in patients under going small bowel anastomosis

Authors

  • Babu Venkatesh Sundar Department of General Surgery, Government Theni Medical College, Theni, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Muthu Sankaralingam Department of General Surgery, Government Theni Medical College, Theni, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Ria Tulsian Department of General Surgery, Government Theni Medical College, Theni, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263341

Keywords:

Early enteral feeding, Small bowel anastomosis, Early bowel recovery, ERAS, Reduced hospitalisation

Abstract

Background: Postoperative nutritional management plays a critical role in surgical recovery, particularly following gastrointestinal procedures such as small bowel anastomosis. Traditional practice delays enteral nutrition until bowel sounds or flatus return; however, recent evidence suggests that early enteral feeding (EEN) may improve outcomes without increasing complications. Aim was to compare patient compliance, tolerance, and clinical outcomes between early enteral feeding and conventional feeding methods in patients undergoing elective small bowel anastomosis.

Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care center over a two-year period. A total of 100 patients undergoing elective small bowel anastomosis were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (Early feeding, n=50): Initiated enteral feeding via nasogastric tube on postoperative day (POD) 2. Group B (Conventional feeding, n=50): Began oral feeding after return of bowel sounds, typically POD 5-7. Parameters assessed included vomiting, abdominal distension, return of bowel function, nasogastric tube removal, infection, anastomotic leak, length of hospital stay, and patient compliance. Data were analyzed using standard statistical tests; a p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Early return of bowel function: Flatus passed significantly earlier in group A (mean 2.4±0.6 days) vs. group B (3.6±0.7 days), p<0.001. Shorter hospital stay: Group A had a significantly shorter stay (6.1±1.3 days) than group B (9.4±1.6 days), p<0.001. Lower abdominal distension: Group A (10%) vs Group B (26%), p=0.04. Similar complication rates: anastomotic leak was rare and not significantly different (2% vs. 4%, p=0.56). High compliance: 92% in Group A tolerated early feeding; 100% in Group B adhered to conventional feeding.

Conclusions: Early enteral feeding following small bowel anastomosis is better tolerated and enhances postoperative recovery of the patients, faster bowel function recovery and reduced hospital stay without increasing the risk of complications. Following Early enteral feeding in routine practice is aligned with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol (ERAS).

References

Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital outcomes for gastrointestinal surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):694-700.

Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O, et al. Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2009;96(2):197-205.

Deitch EA. Role of the gut lymphatic systemin multiple organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;7(2):92-8.

Bozzetti F, Gianotti L, Braga M, Di Carlo V, Mariani L. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients: A randomized clinical trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9292):1487-92.

Braga M, Gianotti L, Gentilini O, Parisi V, Salis C, Di Carlo V. Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with parenteral nutrition. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2):242-8.

Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88(9):1157-68.

Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointestsurg. 2009;13(3):569-75.

Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon MA. Early versus traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(4):473-87.

Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019;43(3):659-95.

Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled rials. BMJ. 2001;323(7316):773-6.

Osland E, Memon MA. Early postoperative feeding in resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2008;143(4):405-15.

Kudsk KA. Current aspects of mucosal immunology and its influence by nutrition. Am J Surg. 2002;183(4):390-8.

Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, McArdle AH, Booth FV, Morgenstein-Wagner TB, et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. Ann Surg. 1992;216(2):172-83.

Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):235-9.

Deitch EA. Gut-origin sepsis: evolution of a concept. Surgeon. 2012;10(6):350-6.

Alverdy JC, Laughlin RS, Wu L. Influence of the critically ill state on host-pathogen interactions within the intestinal microbiome: clinical implications. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009;23(3):547-64.

Shils ME, Shike M, Ross AC, Caballero B, Cousins RJ. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2006.

Klein S, Kinney J, Jeejeebhoy K, Alpers D, Hellerstein M, Murray M, et al. Nutrition support in clinical practice: review of published data and recommendations for future research directions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21(3):133-56.

Jeejeebhoy KN. Total parenteral nutrition: potion or poison? Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(2):160-3.

Fukatsu K, Saito H, Inoue T, Furukawa S, Matsuda T. Effect of enteral nutrition on gut-associated lymphoid tissue in a rat model. Clin Sci. 1999;96(4):341-6.

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606-17.

Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(6):801-6.

DiBaise JK, Young RJ, Vanderhoof JA. Enteric bacterial flora and bacterial ove rgrowth syndrome. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(5):405-14.

Deitch EA. The role of intestinal barrier failure and bacterial translocation in the development of systemic infection and multiple organ failure. Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):403-4.

Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(2):83-90.

Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1995;222(1):73-7.

Netter FH. Atlas of Human anatomy, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier. 2019.

Moore FA, Moore EE. Evolving concepts in the pathogenesis of postinjury multiple organ failure. Surg Clin North Am. 1995;75(2):257-77.

Brandtzaeg P. Function of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue in antibody formation. Immunol Invest. 2010;39(4-5):303-55.

Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery. 2006;26(3):131-6.

Deitch EA. Role of the gut in the development of injury-and shock-induced SIRS and MODS. Mol Med Today. 1998;4(4):129-35.

Artis D. Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(6):411-20.

Gatt M, Reddy BS, MacFie J. Review article: bacterial trans location in the critically ill-evidence and methods of prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(7):741-57.

Kudsk KA. Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(6):1675-85.

Alverdy JC, Chang EB. The re-emerging role of the intestinal microflora in critical illness and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;83(3):461-6.

Moore EE, Jones TN. Benefits of immediate enteral nutrition after major abdominal trauma-a prospective, randomizedstudy. J Trauma. 1986;26(10):874-81.

Camilleri M, Parkman HP, Shafi MA, Abell TL, Gerson L. Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(1):18-37.

Tack J, Janssens J. Influence of proximal gastric acidification on motilin-induced antral contractions and gastric emptying. Gastroenterology. 1992;102(2):456-63.

Hofmann AF. The enterohepatic circulation of bile acids in man. Clin Gastroenterol. 1977;6(1):3-24.

Nightingale JM. Management of patients with a short bowel. World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7(6):741-51.

Ferraris RP, Yasharpour S, Lloyd KC, Mirzayan R, Diamond JM. Dietary regulation of intestinal glucose transport. II. Transporter gene expression in diabetes. Am J Physiol. 1992;262(6Pt1):G1080-8.

Bozzetti F. Nutritional support in oncologic patients: where we are and where we are going. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(6):714-7.

Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly Y-M, et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341(6145):569-73.

Memon MA, Gall TMH, Memon B. Stapled vs handsewn intestinal anastomosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97(6):429-33.

Vather R, Trivedi S, Bissett I. Defining postoperative ileus: Results of a systematic review and global survey. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(5):962-72

Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL. Ameta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1995;221(5):469-78.

Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(3):623-50.

Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(3):466-77.

Ziegler TR, Young LS, Benfell K, Scheltinga MR, Bye RL, Lowe DK, et al. Clinical and metabolic efficacy of glutamine-supplemented parenteral nutrition after bone marrow transplantation. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116(10):821-8.

Lochs H, Dejong C, Hammarqvist F, Hebuterne X, Leon-Sanz M, Schütz T, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Gastroenterology. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(2):260-74.

Weimann A, Braga M, HarsanyiL, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(2):224-44.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Sundar, B. V., Sankaralingam, M., & Tulsian, R. (2026). A comparative study on early versus conventional feeding in patients under going small bowel anastomosis. International Surgery Journal, 13(10), 1882–1889. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263341

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles