Syringe-based closed negative suction drainage for small surgical wounds: a case series and review of low-cost surgical innovation

Prashant Oli

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260848

Authors

Prashant Oli Department of Surgery, B. D. Pandey District Hospital, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260848

Keywords:

Syringe suction drain, Closed suction drainage, Low-cost surgical innovation, Postoperative wound drainage, Negative pressure drainage

Abstract

Postoperative fluid accumulation within surgical wounds can lead to complications such as hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection, and delayed wound healing. Closed suction drainage systems are commonly used to prevent these complications by eliminating dead space and facilitating continuous evacuation of fluid collections; however, commercially available systems may not always be accessible in resource-limited settings. This prospective observational case series was conducted at B. D. Pandey District Hospital, Nainital, India, from January 2024 to June 2025, including 24 patients undergoing minor surgical procedures with anticipated dead space formation. A syringe-based closed suction drainage system was assembled using a disposable syringe and infant feeding tube to generate negative pressure drainage. The mean age of patients was 28 years, with 16 males and 8 females. Indications included excision of soft tissue swellings, minor reconstructive procedures, and closure of wounds with potential dead space. Mean drainage volume was 25 ml on postoperative day 1, 12 ml on day 2, and 4 ml on day 3, with a mean drain duration of 3 days. No hematoma or seroma formation was observed, while two patients developed superficial surgical site infection managed conservatively. Syringe-based closed negative suction drainage is a simple, safe, and cost-effective alternative for small surgical wounds, particularly useful in low-resource healthcare settings.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ramesh BA, Evans JT, Marietta M, Jayalakshmi BK. Suction Drains. 2025 Feb 23. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026.

Fox JW, Golden GT. The use of drains in subcutaneous surgical procedures. Am J Surg. 1976;132:673-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(76)90372-X

Raves JJ, Slifkin M, Diamond DL. A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage. Am J Surg. 1984;148(5):618-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(84)90336-2

Harish R, Kazi FN, Sharma JVP. Efficacy of Subcutaneous Closed Suction Drain in Reduction of Postoperative Surgical Site Infection. Surg J (N Y). 2021;7(4):e275-e280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735900

Strub GM, Moe KS. Negative pressure therapy in head and neck wounds. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21:137-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2012.11.005

Naik A, Arya S, Sharma A. Role of subcutaneous suction drain in reducing SSI in emergency laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2022;9:616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20220631

Pandey V, Chandra D, Kumar R, Singh A, Pratap T, Agarwal S, et al. Role of vacuum suction drain in prevention of abdominal wound complications. Int Surg J. 2020;7:1873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202399

Kim SI, Lim MC, Bae HS, Shin SR, Seo SS, Kang S, Park SY. Benefit of negative pressure drain within surgical wound after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(1):145-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000315

Moss AL. The DIY mini suction drain. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40(5):542-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(87)90094-4

Singh A, Thind MS, Mander KS, Singh GP. Syringe suction drain. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45(6):484-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90216-K

Singh A, Singh G. Syringe suction drain--II. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(3):313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00082-1

Mehrotra S, Mohanty SK, Maudar KK, Tyagi AK. Syringe suction: a simple and effective closed drainage system. Med J Armed Forces India. 1997;53(4):327-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30777-3

Sun ZY, Yin GQ. An easy-to-make suction drain system. Int J Surg. 2009;7(1):82-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.07.003

Weng R, Li QF, Zheng Y. A renovated adjustable syringe suction drain. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(6):e162-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.10.016

Sunderraj, Ellur. Syringe suction drain further simplified. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2007;40:107-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.32673

Dwivedi JS, Gupta AS. Syringe Suction Vacuum Drain: A Cheap Alternative. JPGO. 2014;1(4).

Venkatachalapathy TS, Nagendra Babu T, Sreeramulu PN. A simple syringe suction drain for surgical procedures. J Clin Case Rep. 2012;2:216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7920.1000216

Gopal SV, Kumar M. A simple negative suction drainage for small surgical wounds. Indian J Surg. 2005;67:282-3.

Park DH, Song CH, Han DG, Ahn KY, Byun JS. A simple negative suction drain for ear reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(3):972-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199903000-00032

Igwe PO, Dodiyi-Manuel A, Adotey JM. Spring active drain using bladder (50-60ml) syringe (De Adotey's drain). Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;20:30-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.01.006

Vazifdar S, Gavali UG. Syringe suction drainage for prevention of seroma formation. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10:2780-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20212668

Kamath J, Kamath RK, Bansal H. Improvised two-in-one syringe suction drain. Indian J Plast Surg. 2005;38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.19795