Robotic surgery in emergency abdominal surgery: current applications and future directions

Rayan Mourad; Ernest Cheng; Mina Sarofim; Assad Zahid

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260484

Authors

Rayan Mourad Department of Surgery, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia; St George and Sutherland Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Ernest Cheng St George and Sutherland Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; Innovation, Surgical Teaching and Research Unit, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Mina Sarofim St George and Sutherland Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; Innovation, Surgical Teaching and Research Unit, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Assad Zahid Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; Innovation, Surgical Teaching and Research Unit, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260484

Keywords:

Robotic surgery, Minimally invasive surgery, Emergency general surgery

Abstract

Emergency abdominal surgery carries substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilisation. While laparoscopy is now standard for many acute abdominal conditions, the role of robotic-assisted surgery remains debated in emergency settings due to concerns regarding time to source control, cost, system access, and staffing. Across indications, robotic emergency surgery appears feasible and generally safe in carefully selected, haemodynamically stable patients managed in experienced centres. Short-term clinical outcomes are broadly comparable to laparoscopy, with the most consistent potential advantage being reduced conversion-to-open rates in technically challenging cases at the expense of longer operative times in several cohorts. For common emergencies such as acute cholecystitis and appendicitis, evidence does not demonstrate clear superiority over laparoscopy, and safety signals during adoption underscore the need for governance and audit. Economic analyses consistently report higher costs for robotic emergency cases that are not reliably offset by shorter length of stay or reduced complications. Robotic-assisted surgery should therefore be considered a selective adjunct in emergency abdominal surgery, guided by patient stability, procedural complexity, surgeon expertise, and institutional resources.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS, Cooper Z, Kelly E, Askari R, et al. The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(2):306-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000517

Scott JW, Olufajo OA, Brat GA, Rose JA, Zogg CK, Haider AH, et al. Use of national burden to define operative emergency general surgery. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(6):e160480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0480

Bunjo Z, Traeger L, Murshed I, Bedrikovetski S, Dudi-Venkata NN, Dobbins C, et al. Impact of surgeon specialization on outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2025;68(1):14-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003418

de’Angelis N, Khan J, Marchegiani F, Bianchi G, Aisoni F, Alberti D, et al. Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2022;17(1):4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00410-6

Alkatout I, O’Sullivan O, Peters G, Maass N. Expanding robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology using the potential of an advanced robotic system. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;60(1):53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010053

Charland N, Hadaya J, Mallick S, Tran Z, Cho NY, Le N, et al. National trends and outcomes of robotic emergency general surgery in the United States. Surgery. 2024;176(3):835-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.002

Lunardi N, Abou-Zamzam A, Florecki KL, Chidambaram S, Shih IF, Kent AJ, et al. Robotic technology in emergency general surgery cases in the era of minimally invasive surgery. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(5):493-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016

Anyomih TT, Mehta A, Sackey D, Woo CA, Gyabaah EY, Jabulo M, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2024;18(1):281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02016-3

Reinisch A, Liese J, Padberg W, Ulrich F. Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(2):275-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6

Woldehana NA, Jung A, Parker BC, Coker AM, Haut ER, Adrales GL. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted cholecystectomy in acute care surgery. JAMA Surg. 2025;160(7):755-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1291

Mullens CL, Sheskey S, Thumma JR, Dimick JB, Norton EC, Sheetz KH. Patient complexity and bile duct injury after robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(3):e251705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1705

Strasberg SM, Brunt ML. Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(1):132-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.053

Ghanem M, Shaheen S, Blebea J, Tuma F, Zayout M, Conti N, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case-control outcome analysis and surgical resident training implications. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7641

Balachandran B, Hufford TA, Mustafa T, Kochar K, Sulo S, Khorsand J. A comparative study of outcomes between single-site robotic and multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an experience from a tertiary care centre. World J Surg. 2017;41:1246-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3799-0

Grochola LF, Soll C, Zehnder A, Wyss R, Herzog P, Breitenstein S. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(5):1482-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6430-7

Lee JH, Song KB, Shin SH, Kim SC, Lee YJ, Park KM. Robotic single-site cholecystectomy of 520 cases: surgical outcomes and comparing with laparoscopic single-site procedure. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):S351.

Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1648-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2087-1

Becker T, DeLeon G, Rao V, Pei KY. A comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic appendectomy among ACS-NSQIP hospitals. Laparosc Endosc Robot Surg. 2023;6(2):39-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2023.04.003

Coco D, Leanza S. Robotic-assisted surgery for acute abdominal emergencies: a systematic review of 1142 cases. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02657-y

Robinson TD, Sheehan JC, Patel PB, Marthy AG, Zaman JA, Singh TP. Emergent robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for perforated gastrojejunal ulcers: a retrospective cohort study of 44 patients. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(2):1573-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08447-5

Curfman KR, Jones IF, Conner JR, Neighorn CC, Wilson RK, Rashidi L. Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38:142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04436-3

Coco D, Leanza S. Robotic surgery in acute colorectal emergencies: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02906-0

Cole K, Shahdoost-Rad A, Ibrahim Y, Chaplin G, Pucher PH. Robotic emergency general surgery, future or fallacy? case-matched comparison of operative and clinical outcomes during the adoption phase in a tertiary centre. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02851-y

Anderson M, Lynn P, Aydinli HH, Schwartzberg D, Bernstein M, Grucela A. Early experience with urgent robotic subtotal colectomy for severe acute ulcerative colitis has comparable perioperative outcomes to laparoscopic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2020;14:249-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00968-5

Solaini L, Bocchino A, Avanzolini A, Annunziata D, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G. Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37(7):1497-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04194-8

Zambonin D, Giudici F, Ficari F, Pesi B, Malentacchi C, Scaringi S. Preliminary study of short- and long-term outcome and quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for Crohn’s disease: comparison between single incision, robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy. J Minim Access Surg. 2020;16(4):364-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_61_19

Choi JD, Bradford L, Tang K, Bukofzer M, Dunkin P, Wong H, et al. Robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is feasible and efficient: a prospective cohort study of a day-only protocol from a high-volume robotic surgery centre evaluating short-term outcomes. ANZ J Surg. 2025;95(10):2097-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70263

Murgante Testa N, Mongelli F, Sabbatini F, Iaquinandi F, Prouse G, Pini R, et al. Safety and feasibility of emergency robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair for the treatment of incarcerated inguinal hernia: a retrospective study. World J Surg. 2024;48(3):622-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12063

Kudsi OY, Bou-Ayash N, Chang K, Gokcal F. Perioperative and midterm outcomes of emergent robotic repair of incarcerated ventral and incisional hernia. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(3):473-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01130-2

Birindelli A, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Van Ramshorst GH, et al. 2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0149-y

Ceccarelli G, Pasculli A, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M, Catena F, Rondelli F, et al. Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted emergency treatment of strangulated giant hiatal hernias: report of five cases and literature review. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00316-1

Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1006602

Smith EF, Okocha M. Robotic surgery in emergency general surgery: an overview of UK practice. World J Emerg Surg. 2025;20(1):85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00658-8

Ibrahim Y, Rahman MA, Pickering O, Cole K, Pucher PH. Current evidence and reported experiences for robot-assisted emergency general surgery: systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02696-5

Tustumi F, Bolm L, Edelmuth RC, Maegawa FA, Andraus W, Herman P, et al. Global strategies for the diffusion of robotic surgery. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025;38:e1908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-67202025000039e1908