Comparative effectiveness of open versus endoscopic hernioplasty techniques in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study

Kaththota Ralalage Buddhila Vageesha Jayawardana; Shyla Ruslan Sergeevich; Belyuk Konstantin Sergeevich; Yusafzai Natalia Adil; Boldak Lizaveta Alexeevna

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260838

Authors

Kaththota Ralalage Buddhila Vageesha Jayawardana Department of Surgical Diseases, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno University Clinic, Grodno, Republic of Belarus https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3137-7774
Shyla Ruslan Sergeevich Department of Surgical Diseases, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno University Clinic, Grodno, Republic of Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0077-181X
Belyuk Konstantin Sergeevich Department of Surgical Diseases, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno University Clinic, Grodno, Republic of Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8861-6835
Yusafzai Natalia Adil Department of Surgical Diseases, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno University Clinic, Grodno, Republic of Belarus
Boldak Lizaveta Alexeevna Department of Surgical Diseases, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno University Clinic, Grodno, Republic of Belarus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260838

Keywords:

Inguinal hernia, Lichtenstein repair, TAPP repair, Endoscopic inguinal hernia repair, Open inguinal hernia repair, Post-operative pain

Abstract

Background: The optimal surgical approach for inguinal hernia repair remains debated. This study compared open (mesh and non-mesh) and endoscopic hernioplasty techniques, focusing on operative duration, postoperative pain, recovery and early complications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 334 patients who underwent inguinal hernioplasty at a single university clinic (2022-2024). Five techniques were evaluated: Bassini repair (n=32), Kimbarovsky repair (n=34), Lichtenstein tension-free repair (n=178), transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP; n=71) and extended totally extraperitoneal repair (eTEP, n=19). Outcomes assessed included operative duration, postoperative pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale-VAS), pain duration and hospital stay, narcotic analgesic requirements and early complications.

Results: Endoscopic techniques (TAPP and eTEP) demonstrated superior perioperative outcomes compared with open repairs. Patients undergoing TAPP/eTEP reported lower VAS scores (p<0.001) and a shorter duration of pain, with no narcotic analgesic use, versus 7.3% (Lichtenstein) and 34.8% (Bassini/Kimbarovsky). Median hospital stay was shorter after endoscopic repair (4 days) than following Lichtenstein repair (6–7 days). However, endoscopic procedures required longer operative times than open techniques. Early complication rates were low across all groups; seromas occurred more frequently after TAPP/eTEP repair (3.3%) than after Lichtenstein repair (0.5%), while hematomas were not observed in endoscopic cases.

Conclusions: Endoscopic inguinal hernioplasty is associated with reduced postoperative pain, minimal narcotic requirement and shorter hospital stay, but longer operative duration. These techniques should be considered preferentially when adequate surgical expertise and resources are available and rapid recovery is prioritised. Lichtenstein repair remains a reliable open alternative, while non-mesh techniques demonstrated less favourable outcomes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Engbang JP, Essola B, Fouda B, Baakaiwe LD, Chichom AM, Ngowe MN. Inguinal hernias in adults: epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects in the city of Douala. J Surg Res. 2021;4(1):95-118.

Jenkins JT, O’dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. BMJ. 2008;336(7638):269-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39450.428275.AD

Ridha H, de Vries RP, Nijholt IM, Abbes S, Boomsma MF, Nijveldt RJ. Positive predictive value of ultrasound in correctly identifying an inguinal hernia: a single-centered retrospective pilot study. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01272-x

Tuma F, Lopez RA, Varacallo M. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis: inguinal region (inguinal canal). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470204. Accessed on 24 June 2025.

Sharma M, Pathania OP, Kapur A, Thomas S, Kumar A. A randomised controlled trial of excision versus invagination in the management of indirect inguinal hernial sac. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;101(2):119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0160

Huerta S. The gold-standard technique for inguinal hernia repair is the open approach. Hernia. 2020;24(5):1125-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01997-7

Huerta S, Garza AM. A systematic review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair: management of inguinal hernias in the 21st century. J Clin Med. 2025;14(3):990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030990

Shouldice EB. The Shouldice repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin. 2003;83(5):1163-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00121-X

Kux M, Fuchsjäger N, Schemper M. Shouldice is superior to Bassini inguinal herniorrhaphy. The American J Surg. 1994;168(1):15-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80063-7

Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. The American J Surg. 1989;157(2):188-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6

Köckerling F, Simons MP. Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair. Visceral Med. 2018;34(2):145-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000487278

Chowbey PK, Pithawala M, Khullar R, Sharma A, Soni V, Baijal M. Complications in groin hernia surgery and the way out. J min Surg. 2006;2(3):174-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.27734

Picciochi M, Lee MJ, Pathak S, Banks J, Helliwell JA. Operative versus conservative management for inguinal hernia: a methodology scoping review of randomized controlled trials. BJS Open. 2024;8(5):116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae116

Lv Y, Yang B, Hao G, Wang Y. Mesh fixation versus nonfixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Surgeon™. 2024;90(1):111-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231192066

McCormack K, Scott N, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant A, Collaboration the EU Hernia Trialists, Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochr Datab Sys Rev. 1996;2010(1):833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001785

Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, Bansal V, Bingener J. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):289-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8

Aasvang E, Kehlet H. Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. British J Anaesth. 2005;95(1):69-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei019

Poelman MM, Van den Heuvel B, Deelder JD, Abis GS, Beudeker N. EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endos. 2013;27(10):3505-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3001-9

Bringman S, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Deprest J, Junge K. Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes. Hernia. 2010;14(1):81-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0587-x

Iossa A, Traumueller Tamagnini G, De Angelis F, Micalizzi A. TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how. Front Surg. 2024;11:1352196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352196