Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the first line treatment for choledocholithiasis

B. N. Anandaravi; Sherin Jose

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260453

Authors

B. N. Anandaravi Department of General Surgery, Mysore medical college and research institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India
Sherin Jose Department of General Surgery, Mysore medical college and research institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260453

Keywords:

Choledocholithiasis, Laparoscopic CBD exploration, ERCP, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract

Background: Choledocholithiasis, or common bile duct (CBD) stones, often occurs in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Management typically involves either laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) with cholecys-tectomy or a two-stage approach using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by surgery. Although ERCP is widely used, its complication risks have led to increased interest in LCBDE. The objective is to compare the efficacy and outcomes of LCBDE versus ERCP in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Methods: A prospective study of 40 patients with confirmed choledocholithiasis at KR Hospital, Mysuru, was conducted over 24 months. Patients were evenly divided between LCBDE and ERCP groups.

Results: Both methods were effective in CBD stone clearance. ERCP was associated with faster recovery, earlier oral intake, and return to work. LCBDE was preferred for larger stones and wider ducts. Although a bile leak occurred only in the LCBDE group and ERCP had a 15% re-exploration rate, these differences were not statistically significant. ERCP had a 7.5% failure rate requiring surgical intervention. Notably, despite longer operative time, LCBDE resulted in significantly shorter total hospital stays due to its single-stage nature.

Conclusions: Both LCBDE and ERCP are safe and effective for choledocholithiasis. ERCP offers faster recovery and is better suited for smaller, uncomplicated stones. LCBDE provides a more definitive solution for complex cases with larger stones, leading to shorter hospital stays. Treatment choice should be tailored based on stone characteristics, patient condition, and available expertise.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD003327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2

Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg. 2002;89(12):1495-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02291.x

Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Ragini K, Subodh K, Asuri K, et al. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: role in management of choledocholithiasis. World J Surg. 2014;38(10):2643-50.

Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc. 1993;7(1):36-41.

Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Huang QY. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for calculi: primary closure versus T-tube drainage. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2716-24.

Júnior WS, Peres RR, Campos ACL. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: transcystic approach versus choledochotomy. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013;40(6):473-8.

Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP, Lewis MC. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet. 1998;351(9097):159-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09175-7

Koc B, Karahan S, Adas GT, Ozsoy A, Tutal F. SAGES Abstract Archives. 2010.

Tian Y, Wang Q, Wen M, et al. J Surg Res. 2018.

Meta-analysis: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration + LC vs pre-ERCP + LC. PubMed. 2018.

Al-Temimi MH, Kim EG, Chandrasekaran B, Franz V, Trujillo CN, Mousa A, et al. Discussion of: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis found at time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Analysis of a large integrated health care system database. Am J Surg. 2017;214(6):1080-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.005

Elbegawy MA, Mohamed AT, Elgazzar SA. Early postoperative outcome of posterior component separation through transversus abdominis release for the treatment of large midline incisional hernia. Egypt J Surg. 2022;41(3):891-98.

LCBDE vs ERCP in choledocholithiasis: Meta-analysis and RCT evidence. NICE Appendix A. 2018.

Laparoscopic CBD exploration vs pre/postoperative ERCP: Comparative Study. PubMed. 2014.