A prospective study of exploratory laparotomy and their correlation with microbiological profile in view of anatomical site of perforation peritonitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260133Keywords:
Perforation peritonitis, Exploratory laparotomy, Microbiological profile, Anatomical site of perforation, Surgical site infection, Peritoneal contaminationAbstract
Background: Surgical peritonitis is a common and life-threatening emergency in tertiary care hospitals in India. Secondary peritonitis, most often due to gastrointestinal perforation or ischemia, constitutes the majority of intra-abdominal infections and usually presents late, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Outcomes vary with the site of perforation and the causative organisms. These infections are typically polymicrobial, involving both community- and hospital-acquired pathogens. The growing problem of antimicrobial resistance further complicates management. Identifying the microbial profile and antibiotic sensitivity patterns in relation to perforation site is crucial for appropriate empirical therapy. This study evaluates the spectrum of community-acquired acute bacterial peritonitis and the role of microbiological cultures in its management.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis at GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad. Intraoperative peritoneal fluid and postoperative wound discharge samples were collected using sterile techniques. Isolates were identified by Gram staining and culture, followed by in-vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Results: Males predominated (male:female ratio 3.2:1), with the highest incidence in the 18–30-year age group (41%). The ileum was the most common site of perforation (31%), followed by the stomach (21%) and appendix (17%). Culture positivity was seen in 74% of cases. Escherichia coli was the most common isolate (92%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (42%), Citrobacter (8%), and Acinetobacter (5.4%). Culture positivity increased distally along the gastrointestinal tract. E. coli showed high sensitivity to amikacin (85.3%) and moderate sensitivity to meropenem (37%), while resistance to ampicillin (91%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (87%) was high. Although anaerobes were not isolated, empirical anaerobic coverage remained clinically relevant.
Conclusions: E. coli was the predominant pathogen irrespective of perforation site, highlighting discordance between expected gut flora and actual isolates. Rising resistance to third-generation cephalosporins underscores the need for rational antibiotic use. Early empirical therapy with agents such as amikacin, guided by culture and sensitivity results, along with prompt surgical source control, is essential for improving outcomes in perforation peritonitis.
Metrics
References
ohith P, Jindal RK, Ghuliani DPR. The anatomical site of perforation peritonitis and their microbiological profile: a cross-sectional study. Int Surg J. 2020;7(4):1251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20201407
Dossantos S, Decarvalho M, Serufo J, Pintosilva R, Albuquerque W, Rosa R, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms recovered from intra abdominal infections at Belo Horizonte, Brazil. American J Infect Cont. 2004;32(7):414–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2004.02.005
Jang J Y, Lee S H, Shim H, Choi J Y, Yong D, Lee J G. Epidemiology and microbiology of secondary peritonitis caused by viscus perforation: a single-center retrospective study. Surgical Infect. 2015;16(4):436–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2014.148
Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah VP, Chandrakasan C, Dharanipragadha K. Community acquired secondary bacterial peritonitis in a tertiary hospital of South India: an audit with special reference to peritoneal fluid culture. TG. 2012;33(4):275–81.
Ghosh A, Halder A, Sen N, Dhara A, Ghosh S, Stellone Singh K. A comparative analytical study on outcome of secondary peritonitis using Mannheim’s peritonitis index in geographically diverse Indian patients. Turk J Surg. 2023;1;39(4):300–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6043
Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(7):1005-12.
Ersumo T, W/Meskel Y, Kotisso B. Perforated peptic ulcer in Tikur Anbessa Hospital: a review of 74 cases. Ethiop Med J. 2005;43(1):9-13.
Oheneh-Yeboah M. Postoperative complications after surgery for Typhoid Ileal perforation in adults in Kumasi. West African J Med. 2007;26(1):32–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/wajm.v26i1.28300
More PM, Nichkaode PB, Khatri, Bansod PY: Spectrum of perforation peritonitis: clinical presentation, imaging, biochemical, operative corelation and outcomes. Int J Med Appl Sci. 2015;4:71-80.
Ravisankar J, Venkatesan VS. A study on peritoneal fluid culture and its antibiotic sensitivity in perforative peritonitis cases. IOSR JDMS. 2017;16(03):34–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1603133437
Punamiya AR, Chougule PG, Ahuja BR, Singh V, Mohite ST. Commonest organisms and antibiotic sensitivity in peritonitis due to duodenal ulcer perforation in Krishna Hospital, Karad. Int J Health Sci. 2014;(8):468.
Chen CY, Chen YC, Pu HN, Tsai CH, Chen WT, Lin CH. Bacteriology of acute appendicitis and its implication for the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Surg Inf. 2012;13(6):383–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2011.135
Ananthanarayan, R. Ananthanarayanand Paniker’s Textbook of Microbiology. Eleventh edition., Universities Press (India). 2020.
Ramakrishnaiah V P, Chandrakasan C, Dharanipragadha K, Sistla S, Krishnamachari S. Community acquired secondary bacterial peritonitis in a tertiary hospital of South India: an audit with special reference to peritoneal fluid culture. Trop Gastroenterol. 2012;33(4):275-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7869/tg.2012.70
O'Connell PR, McCaskie AW, Sayers RD. Bailey & Love's short practice of surgery. CRC Press. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003106852
Blot S, De Waele JJ, Vogelaers D. Essentials for Selecting Antimicrobial Therapy for Intra-Abdominal Infections: Drugs. 2012;72(6):17–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11599800-000000000-00000
Last RJ. Anatomy: regional and applied. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1954.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
