The impact of the RoboticScope™ exoscope on cleft lip and palate surgery: surgical advances stimulated by last generation technologies

Authors

  • Esperanza Sanchez-Castrejon Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Alejandra N. Llamas-Ostos Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Kenzo A. Fukumoto-Inukai Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Maria M. Cabrera-Cifuentes Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Osvaldo I. Guevara-Valmaña Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Ricardo R. Caballero Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • Rogelio M. Wagner Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Ciudad de México, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260135

Keywords:

RoboticScope, Exoscope, Cleft lip and palate surgery, Cheiloplasty, Palatoplasty

Abstract

RoboticScope™ (RS™) is a robotic exoscope that integrates three-dimensional high-definition visualization with hands-free control, offering potential advantages in microsurgical procedures. Cleft lip and palate (CLP) repair require a small and deep surgical field, precise tissue handling, and presents ergonomic challenges for surgeons and limitations in surgical teaching. This case series describes. The feasibility, safety, advantages, and limitations of using RS™ during cheiloplasty and palatoplasty. Eight patients with unilateral cleft lip and/or palate were included: four cheiloplasties and four palatoplasties, half performed with RS™ and half with conventional techniques by the same surgical team. Intraoperative variables, postoperative outcomes, and surgeon satisfaction were evaluated. No differences were observed between groups regarding bleeding, aesthetic-functional outcomes, or short-term complications at six months. Surgical time was longer when using RS™, reflecting the initial learning curve. Surgeons reported superior visualization, improved ergonomics, and enhanced educational value with RS™, allowing real-time sharing and recording of procedures. Despite limitations related to equipment cost and unfavorable angles in specific surgical steps, RS™ demonstrated technical feasibility and safety in CLP surgery. This case series represents the first clinical report of RS™ use in cleft lip and palate repair and suggests that it is a promising adjunct to conventional techniques, particularly for microsurgical precision, ergonomics, and surgical education.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aycart MA, Caterson EJ. Advances in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(11):1932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111932

Vyas RM, Warren SM. Unilateral cleft lip repair. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(2):165-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2013.12.009

Boehm F, Schuler PJ, Riepl R, Schild L, Hoffmann TK, Greve J. Performance of microvascular anastomosis with a new robotic visualization system: proof of concept. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(3):705-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01294-5

Kato M, Watanabe A, Watanabe S, Utsunomiya H, Yokoyama T, Ogishima S. Cleft Lip and Palate Repair Using a Surgical Microscope. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(6):490-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01060

Piloni M, Bailo M, Gagliardi F, Mortini P. Resection of Intracranial Tumors with a Robotic-Assisted Digital Microscope: A Preliminary Experience with Robotic Scope. World Neurosurg. 2021;152:e205-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.075

Roethe AL, Landgraf P, Schröder T, Misch M, Vajkoczy P, Picht T. Monitor-based exoscopic 3D4k neurosurgical interventions: a two-phase prospective-randomized clinical evaluation of a novel hybrid device. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(12):2949-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04361-2

Podolsky DJ, Fisher DM, Wong Riff KWY, Looi T, Drake JM, Forrest CR. Infant Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: A Feasibility Assessment Using a Realistic Cleft Palate Simulator. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):455e-65e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003010

Smarius B, Breugem C. Surgical learning curve in performing palatoplasty: A retrospective study in 200 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(9):1868-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.021

Sommerlad BC. The use of the operating microscope for cleft palate repair and pharyngoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(6):1540-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000085598.26409.E3

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Sanchez-Castrejon, E., Llamas-Ostos, A. N., Fukumoto-Inukai, K. A., Cabrera-Cifuentes, M. M., Guevara-Valmaña, O. I., Caballero, R. R., & Wagner, R. M. (2026). The impact of the RoboticScope™ exoscope on cleft lip and palate surgery: surgical advances stimulated by last generation technologies . International Surgery Journal, 13(2), 254–257. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260135

Issue

Section

Case Series