Prospective comparative study of outcomes in primary repair and delayed primary repair of flexor tendon injuries of fingers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260131Keywords:
Hand, Flexor tendon repair, Primary repair, Delayed primary repair, RehabilitationAbstract
Background: Hand is the chief executing organ of humans and plays a vital role in carrying out day to day activities both in professional and activities of daily living. Data regarding incidence of flexor tendon injuries and mechanism causing injuries and common age group affected and post-surgical outcome of patients is lacking in an Indian context. In this study we compared the outcomes of flexor tendon injuries undergoing primary repair and delayed primary repair.
Methods: 40 patients between the ages 19-50 years with flexor tendon injuries in zones 2-5 of the hand admitted to department of burns and plastic surgery were included in the study and were divided into primary repair and delayed primary repair groups. All patients were subjected to modified Kessler core suture with continuous epitendon suture for repair of tendons. Duran Houser mobilization protocol was followed in all patients.
Results: Patients were assessed with total active motion score by measuring range of motion along with grip strength measured with digital dynamometer at 1, 3, 6 months following repair.
Conclusions: Outcomes of primary repair of tendon injuries showed more promising results than delayed primary repair. Less complications rate makes primary repair more favourable than delayed primary repair.
Metrics
References
Verdan CE. Primary repair of flexor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:647‑57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196042040-00009
Phillip E, Wright II. Flexor and Extensor Tendon Injuries. Campbell’s Operative Orthopedics. 2007:3851-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-03329-9.50066-0
Lexer E. Die Verwerthung der freien sehnentransplantation. Archiv Klin Chir. 1912;98:818-25.
Harmer TW. Tendon suture. Boston Med Surg J. 1917;177:808-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM191712061772303
Kirchmayr L. Zur Technik der Sehnennaht. Zentralbl Chir. 1917;40:906-7.
Lahey FH. A tendon suture which permits immediate motion. Boston Med Surg J. 1923;188:851-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM192305311882205
Bunnel S. Repair of tendons in the fingers and description of two new instruments. Surg Gynaecol Obstet. 1918;26:103-10.
Strickland JW. Flexor tendon injuries: Foundations of treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:44-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-199501000-00006
Savage R. In vitro studies of new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br.1985;10(2):135-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681_85_90001-4
Venkatramani H, Varadharajan V, Bhardwaj P, Vallurupalli A, Sabapathy SR. Flexor tendon injuries. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(5):853-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.08.005
Libberecht K, Lafaire C, Van Hee R. Evaluation and functional assessment of flexor tendon repair in the hand. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106(5):560-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2006.11679952
Saini N, Kundnani V, Patni P, Gupta SP. Outcome of early active mobilization after flexor tendons repair in zones II-V in hand. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44(3):314-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.65155
Ranjan V, Mehta M, Mehta M, Mishra P, Joshi T, Kumar T. The Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Injury Repair of the Hand: A Clinico-Epidemiological Study. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33912
Trumble TE, Vedder NB, Seiler JG, Hanel DP, Diao E, Pettrone S. Zone-II flexor tendon repair: A randomized prospective trial of active place-and-hold therapy compared with passive motion therapy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(6):1381-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00927
Spark T, Godlwana L, Ntsiea MV. Range of movement, power and pinch grip strength post flexor tendon repair. SA Orthop J. 2018;17(1):47-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2018/v17n1a7
Torrie PA, Atwal N, Sheriff D, Cowey A. Flexor tendon injuries. Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(3):217-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2010.03.022