The role of CT urogram and ultrasonogram in the evaluation of calculus obstructive uropathy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20254325Keywords:
CT urogram, Ultrasonogram, USG, Calculus obstructive uropathy, Imaging techniquesAbstract
Background: Obstructive uropathy is a critical condition that requires prompt diagnosis, with imaging techniques like ultrasound and multidetector CT playing essential roles in evaluating urinary tract obstruction. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of CT urogram and ultrasonogram (USG) in diagnosing calculus obstructive uropathy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CT USG in diagnosing calculus obstructive uropathy.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, from January to December 2018. It included 45 adult patients with clinically suspected calculus obstructive uropathy referred for USG and CT urogram. Imaging findings, including stone size, location, and hydronephrosis, were recorded, with CT urogram as the reference standard. Data were analyzed using SPSS to assess diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
Results: The study of 45 patients, mostly male with a mean age of 35.8 years, found CT more effective than USG in diagnosing calculus obstructive uropathy. CT detected stones in 75% of patients with a sensitivity of 93.75% and specificity of 100%, whereas USG detected stones in 57.5% with a sensitivity of 61.29% and specificity of 88.88%. CT demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to USG.
Conclusions: Unenhanced CT KUB shows higher diagnostic accuracy than USG in evaluating calculus obstructive uropathy, providing essential information for timely and accurate management.
References
El Ghar ME, Refaie H, Sharaf D, El-Diasty T. Diagnosing urinary tract abnormalities: intravenous urography or CT urography? Radiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:R895-920.
Bierer S, Özgün M, Bode ME, Wülfing C, Piechota HJ. Obstructive uropathy in adults: diagnostic and therapeutic options. Aktuelle Urol. 2005;36(4):329-36.
Sheafor DM, Ames CD, Older RA. Imaging in urinary tract obstruction. Braz J Urol. 2001;27(4):316-25.
Erbas S, Yapar M, Karabulut A, et al. Evaluation of non-urologic causes of acute flank pain: a prospective study. Urol J. 2012;9(2):234-8.
Mustonen S, Kivela J, Korpela J, et al. Intravenous urography in patients with impaired renal function: a prospective study. Acta Radiol. 1999;40(6):528-32.
Khan N. Ureteral calcification: diagnostic approach and management. J Urol. 2012;188(2):589-94.
Chowdhury FU, Kotwal S, Raghunathan G, Wah TM, Joyce A, Irving HC. Unenhanced multidetector CT (CT KUB) in the initial imaging of suspected acute renal colic: evaluating a new service. Clinical Radiology. 2007;62(10):970-7.
Nadeem M, Ather MH, Jamshaid A, Zaigham S, Mirza R, Salam B. Rationale use of unenhanced multi-detector CT (CT KUB) in evaluation of suspected renal colic. International Journal of Surgery. 2012;10(10):634-7.
Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Özkaynak C, Karaali KA, Kabaalioğlu A, et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. European radiology. 1998;8:212-7.
Fowler KA, Locken JA, Duchesne JH, Williamson MR. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology. 2002;222(1):109-13.
Sommer FG, Jeffrey Jr RB, Rubin GD, Napel S, Rimmer SA, Benford J, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1995;165(3):509-13.
Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1996;166(1):97-101.
Ather MH, Faizullah K, Achakzai I, Siwani R, Irani F. Alternate and incidental diagnoses on noncontrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography for acute flank pain.
Rekant EM, Gibert CL, Counselman FL. Emergency department time for evaluation of patients discharged with a diagnosis of renal colic: unenhanced helical computed tomography versus intravenous urography. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2001;21(4):371-4.
Kondekar S, Minne I. Comparative Study of Ultrasound and Computerized Tomography for Nephrolithiasis Detection. Radiology. 2020;5(2):B4-7.
Kirpalani A, Khalili K, Lee S, Haider MA. Renal colic: comparison of use and outcomes of unenhanced helical CT for emergency investigation in 1998 and 2002. Radiology. 2005;236(2):554-8.
Souza LR, Goldman SM, Faintuch S, Faria JF, Bekhor D, Tiferes DA, et al. Comparison between ultrasound and noncontrast helical computed tomography for identification of acute ureterolithiasis in a teaching hospital setting. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2007;125:102-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
