Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds and biological constructs as a paradigm shift in orchestrating recapitulative tissue regeneration for complex hand reconstruction

Authors

  • José E. H. Jaramillo Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260148

Keywords:

Decellularized extracellular matrix, Biological scaffolds, Tissue engineering, Hand regeneration, Guided tissue regeneration, Biomimetic materials, Nerve conduits, Tendon reconstruction, Chondral defects, Vascularization, Biocompatibility, Host remodelling

Abstract

The inherent limited regenerative capacity of composite tissues in the human hand, frequently compromised by trauma, oncological resection, or degenerative pathologies, presents a formidable challenge in restorative surgery. Conventional autografts are constrained by donor site morbidity, finite availability, and suboptimal structural integration, while synthetic implants often fail to provide the requisite biological cues for true histogenesis. This has precipitated a translational pivot towards bioengineered strategies leveraging decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) scaffolds. These biological frameworks, derived from allogeneic or xenogeneic tissues, are meticulously processed to remove immunogenic cellular antigens while preserving the intricate ultrastructural architecture and native bioactive signaling molecules, including glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans, and conserved growth factors. Upon implantation, these biomimetic scaffolds act as instructive three-dimensional blueprints, facilitating host cell recruitment, proliferation, and spatially organized differentiation—a process known as guided tissue regeneration.  Critical applications in hand surgery include the use of dECM nerve conduits for bridging digital nerve gaps, chondrogenic scaffolds for articular cartilage restoration in the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints, and tendon augmentation grafts. Furthermore, the advent of bioprinting and organoid culture technologies enables the pre-seeding of these scaffolds with autologous progenitor cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells or tenocytes, creating advanced tissue-engineered constructs. The overarching objective is to transcend mere mechanical repair and achieve true biological integration and functional restitution, thereby restoring the intricate biomechanics and sensorimotor repertoire of the human hand. This manuscript will elucidate the foundational science of dECM scaffolds, delineate their current clinical applications in hand surgery, and discuss the translational hurdles and future trajectories of this burgeoning field.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Tissue Regeneration and Organ Repair. Medscape. 2003. Available at: https://www.medscape.com/ viewarticle/457173. Accessed on 30 October 2025.

Vacanti CA. The history of tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10(3):569-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00421.x

Mikael PE, Golebiowska AA, Xin X, Rowe DW, Nukavarapu SP. Evaluation of an Engineered Hybrid Matrix for Bone Regeneration via Endochondral Ossification. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48(3):992-1005.

Amini AR, Adams DJ, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(13-14):1376-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0076

Mikael PE, Golebiowska AA, Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP. Evaluation of Autologously Derived Biomaterials and Stem Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020;26(19-20):1052-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0011

Mikael PE, Golebiowska AA, Xin X, Rowe DW, Nukavarapu SP. Evaluation of an Engineered Hybrid Matrix for Bone Regeneration via Endochondral Ossification. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48(3):992-1005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02279-0

Dorcemus DL, Kim HS, Nukavarapu SP. Gradient scaffold with spatial growth factor profile for osteochondral interface engineering. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/abd1ba

Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP, James R, Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Electrospun poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29(30):4100-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.028

Golebiowska AA, Nukavarapu SP. Bio-inspired zonal-structured matrices for bone-cartilage interface engineering. Biofabrication. 2022;14(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac5413

Amini AR, Xu TO, Chidambaram RM, Nukavarapu SP. Oxygen tension-controlled matrices with osteogenic and vasculogenic cells for vascularized bone regeneration in vivo. Tissue Eng. 2016;22(7-8):610-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0310

Amini A, Nukavarapu S. Oxygen-tension controlled matrices for enhanced osteogenic cell survival and performance. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42(6):1261-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-0990-z

Nukavarapu SP, Laurencin CT, Amini AR, Dorcemus DL. Gradient Porous Scaffolds. US9707322B2. Available at: https://patents.google. com/patent/US9707322B2/en?inventor=nukavarapu&oq=nukavarapu. Accessed on 30 October 2025.

Bae WG, Kim J, Choung YH, Chung Y, Suh KY, Pang C, et al. Bio-inspired configurable multiscale extracellular matrix-like structures for functional alignment and guided orientation of cells. Biomaterials. 2015;69:158-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.006

Young JL, Holle AW, Spatz JP. Nanoscale and mechanical properties of the physiological cell–ECM microenvironment. Exp Cell Res. 2016;343(1):3-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.037

Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(1):47-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1055

Unal AZ, West JL. Synthetic ECM: bioactive synthetic hydrogels for 3D tissue engineering. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020;31(10):2253-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00270

Ligorio C, Mata A. Synthetic extracellular matrices with function-encoding peptides. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2023;1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-023-00055-3

Nicolas J, Magli S, Rabbachin L, Sampaolesi S, Nicotra F, Russo L. 3D extracellular matrix mimics: fundamental concepts and role of materials chemistry to influence stem cell fate. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(6):1968-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00045

Nakamura N, Kimura T, Kishida A. Overview of the development, applications, and future perspectives of decellularized tissues and organs ACS Biomater. Sci Eng. 2017;3(7):1236-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00506

Bejleri D, Davis ME. Decellularized extracellular matrix materials for cardiac repair and regeneration Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2019;8(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801217

Kusindarta DL, Wihadmadyatami H. The role of extracellular matrix in tissue regeneration. Tissue Regen. 2018;75728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75728

Chen FM, Liu X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci. 2016;53:86-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004

Bonnans C, Chou J, Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15 (12):786-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3904

Caralt M, Uzarski JS, Iacob S, Obergfell KP, Berg N, Bijonowski BM, et al. Optimization and critical evaluation of decellularization strategies to develop renal extracellular matrix scaffolds as biological templates for organ engineering and transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(1):64-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12999

Luo Z, Bian Y, Su W, Shi L, Li S, Song Y, et al. Comparison of various reagents for preparing a decellularized porcine cartilage scaffold. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(3):1417-27.

Rosario DJ, Reilly GC, Ali Salah E, Glover M, Bullock AJ, MacNeil S. Decellularization and sterilization of porcine urinary bladder matrix for tissue engineering in the lower urinary tract. Regen Med. 2008;3(2):145-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.3.2.145

Elder BD, Eleswarapu SV, Athanasiou KA. Extraction techniques for the decellularization of tissue engineered articular cartilage constructs. Biomaterials. 2009;30(22):3749-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.050

Nakayama KH, Batchelder CA, Lee CI, Tarantal AF. Decellularized rhesus monkey kidney as a three-dimensional scaffold for renal tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2010;16(7):2207-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0602

Cheng CW, Solorio LD, Alsberg E. Decellularized tissue and cell-derived extracellular matrices as scaffolds for orthopaedic tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(2):462-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.012

Mangold S, Schrammel S, Huber G, Niemeyer M, Schmid C, Stangassinger M, et al. Evaluation of decellularized human umbilical vein (HUV) for vascular tissue engineering - comparison with endothelium-denuded HUV. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9(1):13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1603

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Jaramillo, J. E. H. (2026). Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds and biological constructs as a paradigm shift in orchestrating recapitulative tissue regeneration for complex hand reconstruction . International Surgery Journal, 13(2), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260148

Issue

Section

Review Articles