A comparative prospective randomized study of LigaSure versus electrocautery for axillary dissection in modified radical mastectomy with half pressure suction drain: impact on seroma formation

Authors

  • Richa Nautiyal Department of General Surgery, Aadhar Health Institute, Hisar, Haryana, India
  • Harish Sharma Department of General Surgery, Aadhar Health Institute, Hisar, Haryana, India
  • Deepak Mittal Department of General Surgery, Aadhar Health Institute, Hisar, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260456

Keywords:

Modified radical mastectomy, LigaSure, Electrocautery, Axillary dissection, Seroma

Abstract

Background: Seroma formation remains the most frequent complication following modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The choice of dissection technique plays a role in its incidence. This study compared LigaSure with conventional electrocautery for axillary dissection in terms of seroma formation and related outcomes.

Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted on 50 female patients with unilateral FNAC/Biopsy proven breast carcinoma undergoing MRM, at Aadhar health institute, Hisar, Haryana. Patients were randomized into two groups: group A (electrocautery, n=25) and group B (LigaSure, n=25). Standardized half-pressure negative suction drains were placed in all cases. Outcomes compared in terms of operative time, daily drain output, duration of drainage, incidence of seroma formation, and number of seroma aspirations.

Results: The mean operative time, was shorter in the LigaSure group, though not significant statistically. Drain output up to postoperative day 3 was significantly lower in the LigaSure group (p<0.05), but from POD 4 to POD14, cumulative drain output was statistically non-significant. Seroma incidence was reduced with LigaSure (28%) compared to electrocautery (32%), though not statistically significant. The seroma aspirations were also lower in the LigaSure group in number, but non-significant.

Conclusions: LigaSure reduces operative time and drainage volume, with a trend toward fewer seroma formation compared to electrocautery. Although the difference in seroma incidence did not reach statistical significance, LigaSure appears to be a safer and more efficient option for axillary dissection in MRM.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Park HS, Lee J, Kim JY, Park JM, Kwon Y. A prospective randomized study to compare postoperative drainage after mastectomy using electrosurgical bipolar systems and conventional electrocautery. J Breast Cancer. 2022;25(4):307-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e29

Tukenmez M, Agcaoglu O, Aksakal N, Destek S, Cabioglu N, Barbaros U, et al. The use of LigaSure vessel sealing system in axillary dissection: effect on seroma formation. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014;109(5):620-5.

Wienerroither V, Hammer R, Kornprat P, Schrem H, Wagner D, Mischinger HJ, et al. Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01888-2

Isozaki H, Yamamoto Y, Murakami S, Matsumoto S, Takama T. Impact of the surgical modality for axillary lymph node dissection on postoperative drainage and seroma formation after total mastectomy. Patient Saf Surg. 2019;13:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0199-z

Keelan S, Dowling GP, Roche T, Hegarty A, Davey MG, Dhannoon AA, et al. Monopolar diathermy versus a vessel-sealing device for reducing postoperative drain output after simple mastectomy: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2024;111(3):29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae029

Zia S, Khan A, Fatima N. Comparative evaluation of LigaSure and electrocautery in axillary dissection for breast carcinoma. Int J Surg Oncol. 2023.

Tukenmez M, Agcaoglu O, Aksakal N. LigaSure versus conventional techniques in axillary lymph node dissection. Breast J. 2014;20(5):480-5.

Antonio M, Rossi G. Prospective randomized trial comparing LigaSure and electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy. Eur Surg Res. 2019;60(3-4):149-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2019.v3.i1c.28

Cortedellas N. LigaSure reduces seroma formation after mastectomy: a clinical study. J Breast Surg. 2020;5(2):98-104.

Macario A, Dexter F, Sypal J, Cosgriff N, Heniford BT. Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Innov. 2008;15(4):284-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350608324933

Kuroi K, Shimozuma K. Pathophysiology and risk factors for seroma formation after breast surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;97(2):107-13.

Di Monta G, Caracò C, Di Marzo M, Mori S, Rinaldo M. Impact of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system in breast surgery with axillary lymph node dissection and in stage III melanoma patients: a review of current evidence for its use in surgical practice. Plast Surg Mod Tech. 2021;5(158):2577-701.

Irfan S, Randhawa SR, Qadir H, Iqbal MS, Akhtar N, Latif T. Comparison of electrocautery and LigaSure in terms of per-operative blood loss in modified radical mastectomy. Ann Punjab Med Coll. 2023;17(1):14-7.

Riaz O, Akthar N, Khan SM, Alamgir AR, Sultan S, Ejaz H. Comparison between electrocautery and LigaSure in terms of per-operative blood loss in modified radical mastectomy in carcinoma breast. Prof Med J. 2024;31(2):155-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2024.31.02.7958

Jamil T, Tarar JM, Nasir F, Zahid MM, Ali A. The risks of early complications from level II axillary clearance in modified radical mastectomy. Pak J Health Sci. 2024;7(2):120-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i07.1909

Obadiel YA, Al-Ba’adani MN, Haidar QH. Early complications following modified radical mastectomy. Open Access Libr J. 2020;7:6992.

Liu H, Luo C. Effect of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy on quality of life of early breast cancer patients. Food Sci Technol. 2021;42:47021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.47021

Alturky B, Alotaibi AH, Alghamdi AS, et al. Mastectomy for women with breast cancer: types and considerations. EC Microbiol. 2019;15:1–10.

Giunta G, Rossi M, Toia F, Rinaldi G, Cordova A. Male breast cancer: modified radical mastectomy or breast conservation surgery? A case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:89-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.030

Ismail AM. Evaluation of the effect of mastectomy flap fixation and axillary space obliteration with separation of both spaces in reduction of seroma formation in modified radical mastectomy cases: Ismailia Teaching Oncology Hospital experience. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2022;88(1):3651-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2022.249510

Kuroi K, Shimozuma K, Taguchi T, Imai H, Yamashiro H, Ohsumi S, Saito S. Pathophysiology of seroma in breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2005;12(5):288-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.288

Unger J, Rutkowski R, Kohlmann T, Paepke S, Zygmunt M, Ohlinger R. Potential risk factors influencing the formation of postoperative seroma after breast surgery: a prospective study. Anticancer Res. 2021;41(2):859-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14838

Pan XF, Huan JL, Qin XJ. Potential risk factors for the development of seroma following mastectomy with axillary dissection. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015;3(1):222-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2014.430

Zieliński J, Jaworski R, Irga N, Kruszewski JW, Jaskiewicz J. Analysis of selected factors influencing seroma formation in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(1):86-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.29219

Stehbens WE. Postmastectomy serous drainage and seroma: probable pathogenesis and prevention. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(11):877-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02832.x

Turner EJH, Benson JR, Winters ZE. Techniques in the prevention and management of seromas after breast surgery. Future Oncol. 2014;10(6):1049-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.13.257

Gardner A, Pass HA, Prance S. Techniques in the prevention and management of breast seroma: an evaluation of current practice. Womens Oncol Rev. 2005;5(3):135-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14733400500216814

Ud Din SS, Hussain MT, Khan E, Shah M, Sadiq A, Syed A. Post-mastectomy seroma formation: scalpel versus LigaSure dissection in modified radical mastectomy. J Islamabad Med Dent Coll. 2023;12(3):120-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.919

Archana A, Sureshkumar S, Vijayakumar C, Palanivel C. Comparing the harmonic scalpel with electrocautery in reducing postoperative flap necrosis and seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy in carcinoma breast patients: a double-blind prospective randomized control trial. Cureus. 2018;10(2):2200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2476

Chintamani, Singhal V, Singh JP, Bansal A, Saxena S. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-5-11

Galatius H, Okholm M, Hoffmann J. Mastectomy using ultrasonic dissection: effect on seroma formation. Breast. 2003;12(5):338-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00110-3

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Nautiyal, R., Sharma, H., & Mittal , D. (2026). A comparative prospective randomized study of LigaSure versus electrocautery for axillary dissection in modified radical mastectomy with half pressure suction drain: impact on seroma formation. International Surgery Journal, 13(3), 360–364. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20260456

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles