Outcome of thyroid surgery by applying a haemostatic agent with and without a drain

Authors

  • S. M. Asikur Rahat Department of Surgery, Rangpur Medical College Hospital, Rangpur, Bangladesh
  • M. Mahmudul Hasan Department of Surgery, Z. H. Sikder Women's Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Aminul I. Joarder Department of General Surgery, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Rokebul H. Mazumdar Department of Surgery, Ad Din Akij Medical College, Khulna, Bangladesh
  • Nayeemun Akter Department of Surgery, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Ferdous Alam Department of General Surgery, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Rajib Chowdhury Habiganj Medical College, Habiganj, Bangladesh
  • M. Shaukat Ali Department of Surgery, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Emdadul Hoque Department of Surgery, Manikgonj Medical College, Manikgonj, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20253832

Keywords:

Thyroidectomy, Haemostatic agent, Drain tube, Postoperative complications

Abstract

Background: Thyroidectomy is a common surgical procedure for benign and malignant thyroid diseases. The routine uses of surgical drains following thyroidectomy remains controversial, particularly with the application of modern haemostatic agents that may effectively prevent postoperative bleeding and hematoma formation. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of thyroid surgery with and without the use of a drain tube when haemostatic agents were applied.

Methods: This comparative study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), from July 2023 to August 2024. A total of 30 patients undergoing thyroid surgery were divided into two groups: 16 with drain tube placement and 14 without.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 36.94±8.73 years in the drain group and 39.86±7.12 years in the non-drain group, with females comprising the majority in both. Multinodular goiter was the predominant diagnosis, and total thyroidectomy was the most frequently performed procedure. Postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, respiratory distress, wound infection, and stridor were not observed in either group. Only two patients (14.3%) in the non-drain group developed mild neck swelling, which resolved with conservative management. The mean hospital stay was shorter in patients without drains, and although this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The application of haemostatic agents during thyroid surgery provides effective intraoperative hemostasis, making routine drain tube placement unnecessary. Avoiding drains may enhance patient comfort and reduce hospital stay without increasing postoperative complications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gil Z, Patel SG. Surgery for thyroid cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2008;17(1):93-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2007.10.014

Tartaglia N, Di Lascia A, Lizzi V, Cianci P, Fersini A, Ambrosi A, et al. Haemostasis in thyroid surgery: Collagen‐fibrinogen‐thrombin patch versus cellulose gauze—Our experience. Surg Res Pract. 2016;2016:3058754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3058754

Rosato L, Avenia N, Bernante P, De Palma M, Gulino G, Nasi PG, et al. Complications of thyroid surgery: analysis of a multicentric study on 14,934 patients operated on in Italy over 5 years. World J Surg. 2004;28(3):271-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-6903-1

Lang BHH, Yih PC, Lo CY. A review of risk factors and timing for postoperative hematoma after thyroidectomy: is outpatient thyroidectomy really safe? World J Surg. 2012;36(10):2497-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1682-1

Harding J, Sebag F, Sierra M, Palazzo FF, Henry J-F. Thyroid surgery: postoperative hematoma—prevention and treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;391(3):169-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-006-0028-6

Polychronidis G, Hüttner FJ, Contin P, Goossen K, Uhlmann L, Heidmann M, et al. Network meta-analysis of topical haemostatic agents in thyroid surgery. Br J Surg. 2018;105(12):1573-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10975

McNally MM, Agle SC, Williams RF, Pofahl WE. A comparison of two methods of hemostasis in thyroidectomy. Am Surg. 2009;75(11):1073-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480907501109

Dehal A, Abbas A, Hussain F, Johna S. Risk factors for neck hematoma after thyroid or parathyroid surgery: ten-year analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample database. Perm J. 2015;19(1):22-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/14-085

Greenleaf EK, Goyal N, Hollenbeak CS, Boltz MM. Resource utilization associated with cervical hematoma after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. J Surg Res. 2017;218:67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.04.035

Scaroni M, von Holzen U, Nebiker C. Effectiveness of hemostatic agents in thyroid surgery for the prevention of postoperative bleeding. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58666-4

Williams J, Toews D, Prince M. Survey of the use of suction drains in head and neck surgery and analysis of their biomechanical properties. J Otolaryngol. 2003;32(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2003.35365

Karayacin K, Besim H, Ercan F, Hamamci O, Korkmaz A. Thyroidectomy with and without drains. East Afr Med J. 1997;74(7):431-2.

Wang H, Yu H, Zhang N, Xiang L. Incidence, risk factors, and management of postoperative hematoma following anterior cervical decompression and fusion for degenerative cervical diseases. Neurospine. 2023;20:525-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2245066.533

Tabaqchali MA, Hanson JM, Proud G. Drains for thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy: fact or fiction? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81:302-5.

Karcioglu AS, Triponez F, Solórzano C, Iwata AJ, Ahmed AAA, Almquist M, et al. Emerging imaging technologies for parathyroid gland identification and vascular assessment in thyroid surgery: a review from the American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery Section. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(3):253-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4421

Miyauchi A, Ito Y, Fujishima M, Miya A, Onoda N, Kihara M, et al. Long-term outcomes of active surveillance and immediate surgery for adult patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: 30-year experience. Thyroid. 2023;33:817-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2023.0076

Hsiao V, Light TJ, Adil AA, Tao M, Chiu AS, Hitchcock M, et al. Complication rates of total thyroidectomy vs hemithyroidectomy for treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148(6):531-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0621

Liu J, Sun W, Dong W, Wang Z, Zhang P, Zhang T, Zhang H. Risk factors for post-thyroidectomy haemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(5):591-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0757

Chou R, Dana T, Haymart M, Leung A, Tufano R, Sosa J, Ringel M. Active surveillance versus thyroid surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic review. Thyroid. 2022;32:817-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2021.0539

Ricciardi S, Giovanniello D, Jaus MO, Merlo L, Petrella L, Treggiari S, et al. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive surgery: does sex make a difference? Video-Assisted Thorac Surg. 2025;10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/vats-24-20

Patel KN. The year in thyroidology: surgical science. Thyroid. 2023;33(1):21-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2022.0659

Ryabchenko EV. A rare form of the thyroid gland cancer against the background of autoimmune thyroiditis. J Clin Pract. 2023;14(4):116-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract386270

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Rahat, S. M. A., Hasan, M. M., Joarder, M. A. I., Mazumdar, R. H., Akter, N., Alam, F., Chowdhury, R., Ali, M. S., & Hoque, E. (2025). Outcome of thyroid surgery by applying a haemostatic agent with and without a drain . International Surgery Journal, 12(12), 2096–2102. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20253832

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles