Perioperative and postoperative morbidity following open hemorrhoidectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20254321Keywords:
Open hemorrhoidectomy, Milligan-Morgan technique, Postoperative morbidity, Pain management, Resource-limited settingsAbstract
Background: Open hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan-Morgan technique) remains a standard procedure for advanced hemorrhoidal disease, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluated perioperative and postoperative morbidity, recovery patterns, and cost-effectiveness in a Bangladeshi cohort.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 65 patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy for grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Data were collected on demographics, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain (VAS score), complications, hospital stay, recovery time, and total cost. Descriptive statistics were applied.
Results: The mean age was 40.52±10.75 years, with a male predominance (56.9%). Grade IV hemorrhoids were present in 55.4% of cases. Intraoperative bleeding was minimal in 95% of patients. Postoperative pain was significant, with 80% experiencing moderate-to-worst pain in the first 24 hours. Urinary retention occurred in 40%, while reactionary and secondary hemorrhage were noted in 6.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 7.12±2.58 days, and the mean time to return to normal activities was 14.29±3.57 days. Treatment costs were below 10,000 BDT for 98.5% of patients.
Conclusions: Open hemorrhoidectomy is a cost-effective procedure with minimal intraoperative morbidity but significant postoperative pain and delayed recovery. Tailored perioperative care protocols could further enhance recovery and improve patient experience.
References
Cristea C, Lewis CR. Hemorrhoidectomy. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025.
Sun Z, Migaly J. Review of Hemorrhoid Disease: Presentation and Management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(1):22-9.
Nakhla N, Hospattankar A, Siddiqui K, Bridgeman MB. Improving Hemorrhoid Outcomes: A Narrative Review and Best Practices Guide for Pharmacists. Pharmacy. 2025;13(4):105.
Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Strategies to Reduce Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain: A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(3):418.
Picchio M, Greco E, Di Filippo A, Marino G, Stipa F, Spaziani E. Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(Suppl 3):1301-7.
Tavani ME, Partovi Y, Poursaki T, Gharibi F. The Complications of Hemorrhoidectomy From Patients’ Perspective: A Qualitative Study. Health Sci Rep. 2025;8(5):e70724.
van Oostendorp JY, Dekker L, van Dieren S, Veldkamp R, Bemelman WA, Han-Geurts IJM. Comparison of Rubber Band Ligation and Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Hemorrhoids Grade III: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2025;68(5):572-83.
Tomasicchio G, Martines G, Lantone G, Dibra R, Trigiante G, De Fazio M, et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting. Front Surg. 2021;8.
Nasr MESAW, Abdel Mageed AAAD, Ahmed MF, Abdelshafy AA. Comparitive study between laser hemorrhoidoplasty and conventional open surgical hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan technique) in 2nd & 3rd degree piles. Egypt J Surg. 2025;44(1):256-63.
Arun MK, Kumar V, Mukerjee S. Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy versus Open Haemorrhoidectomy (Miligan Morgan) For Grade Iv Haemorrhoids A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res. 2025;14(5).
Bhatti MI, Sajid MS, Baig MK. Milligan–Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy (Closed): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1509-19.
Kumar M, Pankaj D, Kumar N, Abhishek K, Bhushan V, Tajdar Y, et al. A Prospective Study Comparing Stapler and Open Surgical Technique of Hemorrhoidectomy. Cureus. 2023;15(3).
Chishti SSA, Niaz A, Kashif M, Ali W. Comparative Outcomes of Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson (Closed) Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. 2024;16(12).
Azhari MF, Bawazer AK, Abdelmaqsoud HE, Albariqi AAM, Albariqi JMJ, Alqahtani AS, et al. Comparison of open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block: a cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes analysis. Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte. 2025;20(2):122-4.
Kilonzo MM, Brown SR, Bruhn H, Cook JA, Hudson J, Norrie J, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy and Traditional Excisional Surgery for the Treatment of Haemorrhoidal Disease. PharmacoEconomics Open. 2018;2(3):271-80.
Singh P, Baghel A, Silodia A, Saytode VP, Yadav SK, Damde H, et al. Surgical outcome and ethics in adopting new surgical technique in low resource settings: A case study in haemorrhoid surgery. Saudi Surg J. 2020;8(1):9-14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
