A comparative study between single incision multiport laparoscopic appendicectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in tertiary care hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

Authors

  • Dhinesh Babu K. Department of General Surgery, Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sujith Kumar S. Department of General Surgery, Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170979

Keywords:

CON, SILS

Abstract

Background: To compare the outcome of single incision multiport laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in terms of patient recovery time, post-operative pain in Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Methods: A randomized control study was done by alternation with sample size of 50 which divided into two groups (study group 25 and control group 25) and study period is from August 2012 to September 2014.

Results: Patient in single incision laparoscopy group show less post-operative pain in the first 6 and 12 hours compared to the conventional laparoscopy group, but no difference was noticed between the two groups after 24 hours. No significant difference in operating times was noted between the procedures.

Conclusions: One patient in 25 who underwent single incision laparoscopy had wound infection, but no wound complications were noted in the conventional appendicectomy group.  Patients underwent Single incision laparoscopy are happier with scar when compared with conventional laparoscopy group. No difference noted in the duration of post-operative hospital stay.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Dhinesh Babu K., Department of General Surgery, Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

     ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY,

KARPAGA VINAYAGA MEDICAL COLLEGE,

KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT.

 

Sujith Kumar S., Department of General Surgery, Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR,

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY,

KARPAGA VINAYAGA MEDICAL COLLEGE,

KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT.

 

References

Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P. Prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2013;257(3):413-8.

Ding J, Xia Y, Xia Y, Zhang ZM, Liao GQ. Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(5):1088-98.

Kye BH, Lee J, Kim W, Kim D, Lee D. Comparative study between single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Tech. 2013;23(5):431-6.

Lee JA, Sung KY, Lee JH, Lee DS. Laparoscopic Appendectomy with a Single Incision in a Single Institute. Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26:260-4.

Pan Z, Jiang XH, Zhou JH, Ji ZL. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: the single working channel technique. Surgical Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(2):208-11.

Gasior AC, Knott EM, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD. Patient and parental scar assessment after single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(1):120-2.

Buckley FP 3rd, Vassaur H, Monsivais S, Jupiter D, Watson R, Eckford J. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(2):626-30.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-25

How to Cite

K., D. B., & S., S. K. (2017). A comparative study between single incision multiport laparoscopic appendicectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in tertiary care hospital, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, India. International Surgery Journal, 4(4), 1176–1179. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170979

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles