Early outcomes after TAPP vs. Lichtenstein repair: a prospective cohort from a resource limited surgical unit in South India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20253453Keywords:
Inguinal hernia, Herniorrhaphy, Laparoscopic repair, TAPP, Lichtenstein repair, Open surgical repair, Minimally invasive surgery, Comparative studyAbstract
Background: Inguinal hernia repair is a globally prevalent surgical procedure. Despite declining age-standardized prevalence, the absolute global burden is increasing, necessitating optimized surgical strategies. Open Lichtenstein and laparoscopic (TAPP/TEP) mesh repairs represent the two dominant surgical approaches, each with distinct perioperative profiles and patient outcomes. This study prospectively compared these techniques to provide evidence-based guidance for surgical decision-making in resource-constrained healthcare settings.
Methods: A prospective observational comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Chennai, India, between July 2022 to December 2023. Sixty eligible patients (59 male, 1 female; mean age ~45 years) with inguinal hernias were allocated to Lichtenstein open repair (n=30) or TAPP laparoscopic repair (n=30) based on clinical suitability patient factors, and surgeon discretion. Primary outcomes included operative time, postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale-VAS at 12, 24, 48 hours), length of hospital stay, and time to return to work. Secondary outcomes were complications (infection, seroma, hematoma). Statistical analysis employed independent t-tests and chi-square/Fisher's exact tests (p<0.05 significant).
Results: Operative time was significantly longer for TAPP (113.33±12.41 minutes) compared to Lichtenstein (61.50±11.23 minutes; p<0.001). However, the TAPP group demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain scores at 12 hours (4.83±0.70 vs. 7.60±0.77), 24 hours (2.97±0.72 vs. 5.03±0.85), and 48 hours (1.73±0.45 vs. 3.40±0.93; all p<0.001). Hospital stay was shorter for TAPP (4.97±0.85 days vs. 6.70±1.75 days; p<0.001), and return to work was faster (10.30±1.54 days vs. 18.50±2.80 days; p<0.001). Complication rates (infection, seroma, hematoma) were low and comparable between groups (infection: p=0.492; overall complications <5%). Direct hernias were more frequently repaired laparoscopically (p=0.042).
Conclusion: While laparoscopic (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair requires significantly longer operative time and expertise, it offers substantial advantages in the early postoperative recovery, including reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster return to normal activities, with equivalent safety profile compared to open Lichtenstein repair. These benefits support the role of laparoscopic repair, particularly in younger patients and when rapid functional recovery is prioritized, despite its technical demands.
Metrics
References
Itani KM, Fitzgibbons R. Approach to groin hernias. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):551-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5564
Kumar SJ, Kumar UK, Manangi M, Madhu KP, Arun BJ, Nagaraj N. Incisional hernia: incidence, clinical profile, risk factors and prevention. Int Surg J. 2016;3(3):1292-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20161886
Hammoud M, Gerken J. Inguinal hernia. InStatPearls. 2023. StatPearls Publishing.
Nath KK, Kumar V, Singh R. Retrospective review of hernia recurrence rates following mesh versus non-mesh repair techniques. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2024;16(5):2430-5.
Hatewar A, Mahakalkar C, Kshirsagar S, Ram Sohan P, Dixit S, Bikkumalla S. From meshes to minimally invasive techniques: a comprehensive review of modern hernia repair approaches. Cureus. 2024;16(8):66206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66206
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157(2):188-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6
Fallas MJ, Phillips EH. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1994;4:198-202.
Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C. Swedish Multicentre Trial of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Laparoscopy (SMIL) study group. Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2010;97(4):600-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6904
Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1819-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040093
Kanojiya R, Teja MR. A comparative study on postoperative chronic groin pain in ‘suture’ vs ‘glue’ mesh fixation in open hernia repair. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018;17(8):26-9.
Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362:1561-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0
Agarwal PK. Study of demographics, clinical profile and risk factors of inguinal hernia: a public health problem in elderly males. Cureus. 2023;15(4):38053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38053
Pulikkal Reghunandanan R, Ali Usman A, Basheer S, Kuttichi L, Els Jojo J, Abdul Rasheed MF. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: a comparative study. Cureus. 2023;15(11):48619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48619
MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: A randomized comparison. Lancet 1999;354:185-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10010-7
Jeroukhimov I, Dykman D, Hershkovitz Y, Poluksht N, Nesterenko V, Yehuda AB, et al. pain following totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing glue and absorbable tackers. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02932-2
Bjurstrom MF, Nicol AL, Amid PK, Chen DC. Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2014;7:277-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S47005
Skandalakis J, et al. Surgical anatomy: the embryological and anatomic basis of modern surgery. Athens: Paschalidis Medical Publications. 2004: 396.
Haladu N, Alabi A, Brazzelli M. Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:4685-700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6
 
			
		 
			 
			