A comparative study of endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation in the management of varicose veins
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20252680Keywords:
Varicose veins, Endovenous laser ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Minimally invasive surgery, Postoperative pain, Recovery, ComplicationsAbstract
Background: Endovenous thermal ablation techniques, including Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), have largely replaced conventional surgery for varicose veins. This study compares the short-term efficacy and complication profile of EVLA and RFA.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 127 patients with symptomatic varicose veins treated between January 2019 and March 2024 was conducted. Patients were grouped into RFA (n = 49) and EVLA (n = 78) cohorts. Outcome measures included procedure time, pain scores (6 hrs, 1 day, 10 days), time to return to activity, and complications.
Results: The mean procedure duration was 1.31 ± 0.42 hours in the RFA group and 1.23 ± 0.41 hours in the EVLA group (p = 0.321). Pain scores at 6 hours post-procedure were higher in the RFA group (3.65 ± 0.78) compared to the EVLA group (3.38 ± 0.69), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.051). Patients in the EVLA group returned to normal activity significantly earlier (2.26 ± 0.52 days) than those in the RFA group (2.69 ± 0.55 days), with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). Minor complications were comparable in both groups; however, two cases of tip breakage occurred in the EVLA group.
Conclusion: Both RFA and EVLA are effective and safe, but EVLA offers quicker recovery. Long-term comparative studies are warranted.
Metrics
References
Wallace T, Gibson K, Shanik G, Carradice D. Laser vs. radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: a review of efficacy, safety and cost. Phlebology. 2022;37(2):104-10.
Tang TY, Kam JW, Gaunt ME. Contemporary comparison of endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(3):485-92.
Bozoglan O, Mese B, Eroglu E, Ekerbiçer HC, Yasim A. Comparison of endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation in treating varices in the same patient. J Lasers Med Sci. 2017;8(1):13-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2017.03
Gifford SM, Shannon T, Sato D. Clinical outcomes of thermal ablation of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;54:224-31.
Filippo MG, de Oliveira HL, Barroso TA, de Almeida LC, Schanaider A, Espinosa G. Endovenous treatment for great saphenous vein insufficiency: a comparative study of segmental radiofrequency and 1470-nm endovenous laser. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025;59(5):495-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251327014
He G, Zheng C, Yu MA, Zhang H. Comparison of ultrasound-guided endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency for the varicose veins treatment: An updated meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;39:267-75.
Mohammadi Tofigh A, Tahmasebi H, Zebarjadi J. Comparing the success rate and side effects of endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation to treat varicose veins in the lower limbs: a randomized clinical trial. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020;11(1):S43-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.S7
Elzefzaf N, Elfeky MA, Elshatlawy KM, Abdelal A, Elhendawy A, Ahmed A, et al. Evaluation of endovenous laser ablation in the management of varicose veins. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45096
Mallick R, Raju A, Campbell C, Carlton R, Wright D, Boswell K, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with varicose veins. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016;9(8):455-65.
He G, Zheng C, Yu MA, Zhang H. Comparison of ultrasound-guided endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency for the varicose veins treatment: An updated meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;39:267-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.080
Timperman PE. Prospective evaluation of higher energy great saphenous vein endovenous laser treatment. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;16(6):791-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000165044.41012.C8
Kibrik P, Chait J, Arustamyan M, Marks N, Hingorani A, Ascher E. Success rate and factors predictive of redo endothermal ablation of small saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022;10(2):393-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.12.058
Tuncer Çoban P, Dirimeşe E. Evaluation of quality of life after minimally invasive varicose vein treatment. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019;27(1):49-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.16867
Prabakar D, Jahangir S. Comparative analysis of early outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation in the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;7(3):227-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijves.ijves_82_19
Rabe E, Pannier F, Breu FX. Practical issues in laser ablation of varicose veins. Int Angiol. 2020;39(4):309-16.
van Eekeren RRJP, Boersma D, de Vries JPMP, Zeebregts CJ, Reijnen MPJ. Update of endovenous treatment modalities for insufficient saphenous veins: a review of literature. Semin Vasc Surg. 2014;27(2):118-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2015.02.002
Gohel MS, Epstein D, Davies AH. Randomized trial comparing outcomes of varicose vein treatments. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1121-30.
Kim H, Cho S, Lee K, Labropoulos N, Joh JH. Clinical outcomes of nonthermal ablation, thermal ablation, and surgical stripping for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(6):101902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101902
Carroll C, Hummel S, Leaviss J, Ren S, Stevens JW, Everson-Hock E, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(48):1-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta17480
Oliveira RÁ, Mazzucca ACP, Pachito DV, Riera R, Baptista-Silva JCDC. Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews. Sao Paulo Med J. 2018;136(4):324-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0003240418
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
