Comparative study of onlay versus preperitoneal mesh repair in umbilical hernia: a prospective observational analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20252676Keywords:
Umbilical hernia, Onlay mesh repair, Preperitoneal mesh repair, Seroma, Postoperative complications, Hernia surgery techniquesAbstract
Background: Umbilical hernias-especially in women and patients with raised intra-abdominal pressure-pose a risk for postoperative seromas and infections. This study prospectively compares two mesh-based techniques: onlay versus preperitoneal placement.
Methods: From January 2021 to December 2022, 50 adults with uncomplicated umbilical hernias were randomized to onlay (n=25) or preperitoneal (n=25) mesh repair. We monitored seroma formation, wound infection, flap necrosis, and length of hospital stay.
Results: The onlay group experienced a 24% seroma rate and 24% wound-infection rate, plus one case of flap necrosis. The preperitoneal group had zero complications. Average hospital stay was 5.4 days in both arms.
Conclusions: Preperitoneal mesh placement yields significantly fewer postoperative complications and should be the technique of choice for elective, uncomplicated umbilical hernia repair.
Metrics
References
Jagtap M, Harbade SR, Jadhav SP. A Comparative Study of Onlay and Preperitoneal Mesh Repair in Management of Umbilical and Para-Umbilical Hernia. New Indian J Surg. 2019;10(5):475-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.10519.3
Panguluri ASNM, Komatreddy GR, Venkat PRG, Teja KS. A Comparative Study of Onlay and Preperitoneal Mesh Repair in the Management of Umbilical Hernia. Int Surg J. 2023;10(1):110-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20223601
Fonseca MK, Lissandro T, Jader G, Leandro TC. Short-Term Complications After Onlay Versus Preperitoneal Mesh Repair of Umbilical Hernias: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Trial. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02802-x
Bhat KPA, Shetty AS. Study of Onlay Mesh Repair in the Management of Midline Incisional Hernia. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2023;5(3):1082-6.
Afridi SP, Rameez AS, Rajput A. Complications of Onlay and Sublay Mesh Plasty in Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair. J Surg Pak Int. 2015;20(2):48-51.
Priyadarshi PK, Bhartendu K, Durgesh K. Incisional Hernia Repair by Preperitoneal Mesh Application. IOSR J Dental Med Sci. 2020;19(11):22-4.
Campanelli G, Piero GB, Marta C, Andrea M. Primary Inguinal Hernia: Sutureless Open Anterior, Trabucco Repair. The Art of Hernia Surgery. Springer. 2018;28:245-50.
Shahi S, Shruti K. A Prospective Study of Complications, Risks and Causes While Repairing the Incisional Hernia by Preperitoneal Meshplasty. Int J Heal Clin Res. 2021;4(18):390-9.
Ranjan ND, Panda S, Mohanty SK, Behera U. Clinical Management and Postoperative Complications Associated with Umbilical Hernia: A Hospital-Based Study. J Cardiovascular Dis Res. 2023;14(2):1313-22.
Junsheng L, Liangqi L, Xiangyu S, Yong W. Umbilical Hernia Repair by the eTEP: A Reproducible and Valuable Technique. Hernia. 2025;29(1):178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03357-0
Priyadarshi PK, Bhartendu K, Durgesh K. Incisional hernia repair by preperitoneal mesh application. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2020;19(11):22–4.
Jagtap M, et al. Comparative Study of Preperitoneal vs. Onlay Mesh Repair of Ventral Hernias. Int J Dental Med Sci Res. 2022;9:5.
Campanelli G, Piero GB, Marta C, Andrea M. Primary inguinal hernia: sutureless open anterior, Trabucco repair. In: Campanelli G, editor. The Art of Hernia Surgery. Springer; 2018: 245-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_25