Predicting contralateral hernia after unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children: a 5-year cohort from Bahrain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20252172Keywords:
Inguinal hernia, Pediatric surgery, Metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia, Recurrence, Contralateral exploration, Surgical complicationsAbstract
Background: Inguinal hernias are common in pediatric surgery, with unilateral presentations being most frequent. The development of a metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH) after unilateral repair remains a concern, with reported incidence ranging from 5% to 30%. The decision to perform contralateral exploration remains controversial.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 202 children (aged 0–14 years) who underwent open unilateral inguinal hernia repair at Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain, between 2019 and 2024. Data were retrieved from operative logs and electronic records. Reoperation for recurrence or contralateral hernia development was documented. Risk factors including prematurity, hernia side, hernia sac size, and comorbidities were assessed for association with recurrence or MCIH using chi-square tests.
Results: Of the 202 patients, 75.7% were male and 24.3% female. Preterm infants (<37 weeks) represented 15.8%. Right-sided hernias were more common (60.9%), left side (39.1%). Large hernia sacs were noted in 61.9% of cases. Overall reoperation rate was 8.9% (18/202), with MCIH accounting for 94.4% of cases. Only one patient had a same-side recurrence. No risk factors showed statistically significant association with recurrence or MCIH (p>0.3). For example, reoperation was required in 3.1% of preterm versus 10% of full-term infants (p=0.317).
Conclusions: In this cohort, ~9% required reoperation, almost exclusively for MCIH. No traditional risk factors significantly predicted recurrence or contralateral hernia development. These findings suggest that routine contralateral exploration may not be necessary for all patients. Individualized decision-making is recommended, and further studies are needed to identify patients at higher risk for MCIH.
Metrics
References
Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A. Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(5):980-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.020
Vaos G, Zavras N. Risk factors for the development of a contralateral inguinal hernia in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(9):658-62.
Stylianos S. Inguinal hernias and hydroceles in infancy and childhood. In: O’Neill JA Jr, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, editors. Pediatric Surgery. 5th edition. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book. 1998;1071-86.
Grosfeld JL, Minnick K, Shedd F, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Vane DW. Inguinal hernia in children: factors affecting recurrence in 62 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26(3):283-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(91)90503-L
Ron O, Eaton S, Pierro A. Systematic review of the risk of developing a metachronous inguinal hernia in children. Br J Surg. 2007;94(7):804-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5856
Grosfeld JL, Cooney DR, Smith J. Inguinal hernia in children: factors affecting recurrence. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73(3):513-26.
DiMaggio C, Sun LS, Li G. Early childhood exposure to anesthesia and risk of developmental and behavioral disorders in a sibling birth cohort. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(5):1143-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182147f42
Esposito C, Escolino M, Turrà F. Inguinal hernia in premature infants: should the contralateral side be explored? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(1):49-52.
Lee SL, DuBois JJ. Laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateral groin in children with unilateral inguinal hernias. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(3):468-70.
Levitt MA, King KR, Barnhart DC, Othersen HB. The incidence of metachronous inguinal hernia after unilateral repair: is contralateral exploration necessary? J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32(7):1052-4.
Van den Hondel D, van der Zee DC. Predictive value of age, sex, and hernia side for a contralateral inguinal hernia in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(3):602-4.
Kokorowski PJ, Wang HHS, Routh JC, Hubert KC, Nelson CP. Evaluation of the contralateral inguinal ring in clinically unilateral inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2014;18(3):311-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1146-z
Staerkle RF, Guglielmetti LC, Bielicki IN, Gaukel S, Frongia GM, Hilton S, et al. Is it worth to explore the contralateral side in unilateral childhood inguinal hernia? A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(31):e21501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021501
Borenstein SH, To T, Wajja A, Langer JC. Risk of contralateral hernia in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33(8):1214-7.
Wenk K, Sick B, Sasse T, Moehrlen U, Meuli M, Vuille‑dit‑Bille R. Incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernias in children following unilateral repair: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(12):2147-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.056
Chan KL, Tam PKH. A review of 1,215 patients with inguinal hernia in childhood. J Pediatr Surg. 1988;23(4):309-12.
Swartz KR, Meller JL. Contralateral exploration in pediatric inguinal hernia: when is it indicated? Pediatr Surg Int. 1996;11(5–6):374-7.
Askarpour S, Peyvasteh M, Javaherizadeh H, Mehdianzadeh F. Recurrence and complications of pediatric inguinal hernia repair over 5 years. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2013;9(2):58-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XPS.0000426350.23987.7a
Schier F, Klizaite J, Jäger F. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in girls. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(2):289-92.
Hoshino M, Sugito K, Kawashima H, Goto S, Kaneda H, Furuya T, et al. Prediction of contralateral inguinal hernias in children: a prospective study of 357 unilateral inguinal hernias. Hernia. 2014;18(3):333-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1099-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
