Factors affecting surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20252675Keywords:
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy, Spinal stenosis, Prognostic factors, Surgical outcome, Nurick grade, mJOA score, T2 MRI hyperintensityAbstract
Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults over 40 years. It is often progressive, and delayed diagnosis may result in irreversible disability. Surgical decompression is the primary treatment modality in moderate to severe cases. This study evaluated clinical and radiological prognostic factors influencing postoperative recovery in CSM.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between February 2023 and February 2024 in the department of neurosurgery, government medical college Kottayam. A total of 85 patients undergoing anterior or posterior decompression surgery for CSM were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Nurick’s grade and the modified Japanese orthopaedic association (mJOA) scale (Benzel’s modification). Radiological parameters including effective canal diameter and intramedullary signal changes on T2-weighted MRI were studied. Statistical analysis (ANOVA, chi-square) was used to correlate factors with outcomes.
Results: Better outcomes were associated with younger age (<40 years), symptom duration <1 year, Nurick grade 0-2, single-level compression, effective canal diameter >11 mm, and absence of T2 hyperintensity. Poor prognosis was linked to age >60 years, symptoms >2 years, higher Nurick grade (four to five), multilevel compression, canal diameter <9 mm, and well-defined T2 signal changes. The newly developed prognostic scoring system showed good correlation with outcomes.
Conclusions: Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention significantly improve functional outcomes in CSM. Age, symptom duration, preoperative disability, canal diameter, and intramedullary MRI changes are key prognostic indicators. The proposed prognostic scale may aid in clinical decision-making.
Metrics
References
Winn HR. Youmans and Winn Neurological Surgery. Elsevier Health Sciences, 8th edi. 2022.
Kadoya S, Nakamura T, Kwak R, Hirose G. Anterior osteophytectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in developmentally narrow canal. J. Neurosurg. 1985;63(6):845-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.6.0845
Benzel EC, American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Biomechanics of spine stabilization. Rolling Meadows, American Association of Neurological Surgeons publications.
United States. 2001.
Shedid D, Benzel EC. Cervical spondylosis anatomy: Pathophysiology and bio mechanics. Neurosurg. 2007;60(1):1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000215430.86569.C4
Crandall PH, Batzdorf U. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. 1966;25(1):57-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1966.25.1.0057
Batzdorf U. Complex cervical myelopathies In: Frymoyer J, editor. The Adult Spine; Principles and Practice. New York: Raven Press. 1991;1207-18.
Lad SP, Patil CG, Berta S, Santarelli JG, HO C, Boakye M. National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic Myelopathy surg. Neurol. 2009;71(1):66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.02.045
Mouw MD, Hitchon PW, Pathogenesis and natural history of degenerative disc and spinal disease. In: Tindall GT, Cooper PR, Barrow DL, editors. The Practice of Neurosurgery. Vol III. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1996;2357-65.
Levine DN. Pathogenesis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 1997;62(4):334-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.62.4.334
Breig A, Turnbull I, Hassler O. Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaveric material. J. Nerosurg. 1966;25:45-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1966.25.1.0045
Farfan HF. The pathological anatomy of degenerative spondylolisthesis. A cadaver study. Spine. 1980;5(5):412-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198009000-00004
Brain WR, North field D, Wilkinson M. the neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1952;75:187-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/75.2.187
Young PH. Degenerative cervical disc disorders: pathophysiology and clinical syndrome. In: Young PH, editor, Microsurgery of the cervical spine. New York: Raven Press. 1991;49-63.
Montgomery DM, Browser RS. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical syndrome and natural history. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23(3):487-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31760-0
McCormick PC. Clinical manifestations of myelopathy and radiculopathy. In: Cooper PH editor. Degenerative disease of the spine. 1992.
Clark CR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: History and physical findings. Spine. 1998;13:847-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00026
Lundsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Zorub DS. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 2: treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 32 cases. J Neurosurg. 1980;53(1):12-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1980.53.1.0012
Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M, Shichikawa K, Shimomura Y. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(4):609-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.67B4.4030860
Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K. Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J. Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69(2):215-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.69B2.3818752
Gorter K. Influence of laminectomy on the course of cervical myelopathy. Acta Nerochir (Wien). 1976;33:265-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01886675
Heffez DS, Ross RE, Shade-Zeldow Y, Konstantinos K, Sagar S, Robert G, et al. Clinical evidence for cervical myelopathy due to Chiari malformation Eur Spine J. 2004;13(6):516-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0672-x
Takahasi M, Yamashita Y, Sakamoto Y, Kojima R. Chronic Cervical cord compression: Clinical significance of increased signal intensity on MR images. Radiology. 1989;173(1):219-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.173.1.2781011
Mazanek D, Reddy A. Medical Management of cervical spondylosis. Neurosurg. 2007;60(1):43-50.
Carol MD, Ducker TB. Cervical spondylotic myelopathies: Surgical treatment. J Spincal Discord. 1988;1:59-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-198801000-00008
Schmidek HH, Sweet WH, editors. Operative neurosurgical techniques. Orlando Grune Stratton. 1988;1327-42.
Gok B, Mc Loughlin GS, Sciuhba DM, McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Jean-Paul W, et al. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminectomy and instrumented fusion. Neurol Res. 2009;31(10):1097-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174313209X383277
Lee F, Turner JW. A National history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Br J Med. 1963;2:1607-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5373.1607
Ramesh VG, Kannan MGV, Sriram K, Balasubramanian C. Prognostication in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Proposal for a new simple practical scoring system. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017;12(3):525-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.146391
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
