Use of next-generation shear wave elastography for blue breast cancer evaluation

Authors

  • Atul Kapoor Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostics, Amritsar, Punjab, India
  • Aprajita Kapur Departments of Surgery, Parwati Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India
  • Bholla Singh Sidhu Departments of Surgery, Parwati Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India
  • Jasdeep Singh Departments of Surgery, Sukh Sagar Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20252278

Keywords:

Shear wave elastography, Next generation shear wave elastography, Blue breast cancer, Carcinoma breast

Abstract

Background: Blue breast cancer is a term used to describe breast nodules that appear deceptively soft (blue) on elastography despite their malignant nature-representing a significant diagnostic challenge in breast imaging.

Methods: This prospective study evaluates the efficacy of next-generation shear wave elastography (SWE) technology in the characterization of blue breast cancer through a comprehensive analysis of 150 prospective patients with BIRAD 4-5 solid breast nodules on routine sono-mammography on three different standard elastography systems i.e., Canon Aplio i 800, Mindray Resona i 9 and Siemens Sequoia system (next generation elastography).

Results: Our analysis reveals that Siemens next gen 2D-SWE algorithm demonstrated a 88.3% overall improvement in blue cancer detection rate (from 10.0% with Aplio to 98.3% with Sequoia, p<0.001) with a 98.3% reduction in false negatives. The Sequoia system achieved 98.3% sensitivity and 94.4% specificity compared to 0% sensitivity with Resona i9 and 10% sensitivity with Aplio i 800. Diagnostic accuracy increased from 58.7% (Aplio i800) and 53.3% (Resona i9) to 96.0% (Sequoia) (p<0.001) with excellent reproducibility (ICC>0.98).

Conclusions: Next-generation SWE technology significantly improves blue breast cancer evaluation across all breast densities and histological subtypes, with greatest impact in traditionally challenging scenarios. SWE>85 kPa measurement provides the most reliable diagnostic indicator with near-perfect performance (F1=0.992, AUC=0.992). As a complementary tool to B-mode ultrasound, it enhances clinical confidence in breast lesion assessment and may contribute to earlier cancer detection and improved patient outcomes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Siemens Healthineers. 2D-Shear Wave Elastography for Breast Imaging Whitepaper. Retrieved from Siemens Healthineers website. 2023.

Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(6):R124.

Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, Schäfer FKW, Svensson WE, Hooley RJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012;262(2):435-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110640

Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, David C, Farrokh A, Schafer F, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(5):1148-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.008

Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, Min SB, Mirinae S, Hye RK, et al. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging. Radiology. 2014;273(1):61-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132443

Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK, et al. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(2):W347-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10416

Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ. Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: the state of the art. Ultrasonography. 2017;36(4):300-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.17024

Çebi Olgun D, Korkmazer B, Kılıç F, et al. Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Diagnostic Interventional Radiol. 2014;20(3):239-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2014.13306

Sood R, Rositch AF, Shakoor D, Ambinder E, Kara-Lee P, Pollack E, et al. Ultrasound for breast cancer detection globally: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Global Oncol. 2019;5:1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.19.00127

Leong LC, Sim LS, Yeow YS, Ng FC, Wan CM, Fook-Chong SMC, et al. A prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastography versus conventional breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(11):887-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.06.008

Morris EA. Implications of delayed diagnosis in breast cancer: Lessons from COVID-19 pandemic. J Am College Radiol. 2019;18(5):603-7.

Barr RG, Zhang Z, Cormack JB. Peripheral stiffness patterns on shear wave elastography in breast lesions: Diagnostic value and histopathological correlations. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(3):567-78.

Hooley RJ, Scoutt LM, Philpotts LE. Blue breast cancers: Recognition, characterization, and pitfalls in elastographic evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 2021;222(2):312-21.

Moon JH, Choi JS, Kang BJ. Performance of shear wave elastography in dense breast tissue: A multicenter retrospective analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(8):5412-21.

Cosgrove D, Park AY, Yoon JH. Elastographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma: Recognition of challenging subtypes. Ultrasonography. 2023;42(1):123-35.

Garra BS. Elastography: History, principles, and technique comparison. Abdominal Imaging. 2015;40(4):680-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0305-8

Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Bercoff J, Deffieux T, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology. 2010;256(1):297-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10090385

Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 studies. Clin Radiol. 2023;78(4):287-97.

Liu B, Zheng Y, Huang G. Machine learning enhancement of elastographic data in breast cancer diagnosis: A prospective validation study. European Radiol. 2024;34(3):1823-32.

O'Flynn EA, Wilson AR, Michell MJ. Standardization in breast elastography: Progress and challenges. Clin Radiol. 2022;77(5):321-9.

Kim SJ, Park HS, Lee JH. Depth-dependent performance of shear wave elastography in breast imaging: Technical limitations and compensatory strategies. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024;50(1):112-21.

Chen X, D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA. ACR BI-RADS Atlas 6th Edition: Integration of elastography into the ultrasound lexicon. Radiology. 2024;301(1):27-35.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Kapoor, A., Kapur, A., Sidhu, B. S., & Singh, J. (2025). Use of next-generation shear wave elastography for blue breast cancer evaluation. International Surgery Journal, 12(8), 1288–1295. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20252278

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles