A hospital-based study for comparison of RIPASA score and modified ALVARADO score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20252674Keywords:
Acute appendicitis, Diagnostic accuracy, Histopathological confirmation, Modified alvarado score, Ripasa scoreAbstract
Background: Acute appendicitis is a common cause of emergency abdominal surgery. Delayed or inaccurate diagnosis may lead to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. Scoring systems like the Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) and the RIPASA score have been developed to enhance diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of RIPASA and Modified ALVARADO scoring systems, with histopathological findings as the gold standard.
Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Himmatnagar, including 100 adult patients presenting with right iliac fossa pain and suspected acute appendicitis. Each patient was assessed using both scoring systems. Decisions for surgery were made independently by experienced surgeons. The final diagnosis was confirmed via histopathological examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for each scoring system.
Results: The mean age of patients was 27.32 years; 64% were male. Histopathological confirmation of appendicitis was found in 75% of cases. The Modified Alvarado Score demonstrated a sensitivity of 58.7%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 93.6%, NPV of 41.5% and diagnostic accuracy of 66%. In comparison, the RIPASA score showed higher sensitivity (89.3%), specificity (84%), PPV (94.4%), NPV (72.4%) and diagnostic accuracy (88%). ROC curve analysis also favoured the RIPASA score (AUC=0.891) over the Modified ALVARADO Score (AUC = 0.702).
Conclusions: The RIPASA score outperformed the modified ALVARADO score in diagnosing acute appendicitis, offering superior sensitivity, NPV and overall diagnostic accuracy. Given its applicability using basic clinical and laboratory data, the RIPASA score is particularly valuable in emergency and resource- limited settings to guide timely surgical decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging or admissions.
Metrics
References
Harold E, Nathanson LK. Appendix and appendectomy. Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI. Harold E, editors. Maingot’s Abdominal operation. 1997;2:10.
Jones DJ. Appendicitis. Br Med J. 1993;301:207-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003463739309000213
Anonymous. A sound approach to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (editorial). Lancet. 1987;1:198-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90009-2
Ramachandra J, Sudhir M, Sathyanarayana BA. Evaluation of modified alvarado score in preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Evol Med Dental Sci. 2013;2(46):9019-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/1565
Puylaart JB. Acute appendicitis ultrasound evaluation using graded compression. Radiol. 1986;158(2):355-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.158.2.2934762
Pearson RH. Ultrasonography for diagnosing the appendicitis. Br Med J. 1988;297:309-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6644.309
Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1989;76(8):774-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800760803
Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ . C of appendicitis. Am J Radiol. 1986;6:185-93.
Takada T. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis in Surgical indication. In Surg. 1986;71(1):9-13.
Clarke PJ. The use of laparoscopy in the management of right iliac fossa pain. Ann R CollSurg Engl. 1986;68(2):68-9.
Eric BR. Tc-99-HMPAO white blood cell scan for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical presentation. Ann Surg. 1997;226(1):58-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199707000-00008
John H, Neff U, Kelemen M. Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg. 1993;17(2):243-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01658936
Wani MM, Yousaf MN, Khan MA. Usefulness of the Alvarado scoring system with respect to age, sex and time of presentation, with regression analysis of individual parameters. Internet J Surg. 2007;11(2):113-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5580/d56
Hong CF, Adi MI, Thien A. Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:220-5.
Pasumarthi V, Madhu CP. A comparative study of RIPASA score and ALVARADO score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. International Surg J. 2018;26;5(3):796-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180430
Chong CF, ADI MI, Thein A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, et al. Development of RIPASA score a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosing of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(3):220-5.
Al-Hashemy AM, Seleem MI. Appraisal of the modified Alvarado Score for acute appendicits in adults.Saudi Med J. 2004;25(9):1229-31.
Zulfikar A, Saleem R. An Accurate Early Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis by Clinical Scoring and Ultrasonography Reduces Complications. PJMHS 2014;8(4):609.
Nanjundaiah N, Mohammed A. A Comparative Study of RIPASA Score and ALVARADO Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis. J ClinDiagn Res. 2014;8(11):3-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9055.5170
Chong CF, Thien A, Mackie AJ. Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2011;52(5):340-5.
Alvarado A.A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80993-3
Mann CV, Russel RC, Williams NS. The vermiform appendix. Short textbook of Surg. 1995;52:828-41.
Hamilton-Bailey H, Lumley J. Hamilton-Bailey's physical signs in clinical surgery. Butterworth-Heinemann. 1997.
Regar MK, Choudhary GS, Nogia C, Pipal DK, Agrawal A, Srivastava H. Comparison of Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems in diagnosis of acute appendicitis and correlation with intraoperative and histopathological findings. Int Surg J. 2017;4:1755-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171634
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
