Complications between early and standard oral feeding after pancreatico-enteric anastomosis

Authors

  • Satya Ranjan Monda Department of Surgery, Bangladesh Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Asif Aman Department of Surgery, Shaheed Monsur Ali Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Meher Ullah Department of Surgery, Satkhira Medical College Hospital, Satkhira, Bangladesh
  • Jalal Ahmed Department of Surgery, Mugda Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mohammad Emrul Hasan Khan Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Gastroliver Institute & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Ananya Chowdhury Department of Microbiology, Bangladesh Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Sabrina Akhter Qurashi Department of Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20251900

Keywords:

Complications, Early oral feeding, Pancreatico-enteric anastomosis, Standard oral feeding

Abstract

Background: Pancreatico-enteric anastomosis is a complex and challenging surgical procedure. Early postoperative nutritional support plays a crucial role in minimizing complications and improving outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the complications associated with early oral feeding and standard oral feeding following pancreatico-enteric anastomosis.

Methods: This study was conducted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital (July 2023–June 2024) on patients undergoing pancreatico-enteric anastomosis. After consent, they were assigned to Group A (early feeding on POD 1–2) or Group B (standard feeding on POD 4-5). Serum albumin was measured preoperatively and on POD 3 and 7; serum and drain amylase were assessed on POD 3.

Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 62.5% of Group A and 58.3% of Group B, while longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy was done in 37.5% and 41.7%, respectively. POPF occurred in 16.7% of Group A and 25.0% of Group B, with no significant difference in severity. Other postoperative complications (vomiting, diarrhoea, wound issues, respiratory infections) were similar between groups. However, Group A had a significantly shorter hospital stay (9.33±3.75 days) than Group B (12.3±3.46 days).

Conclusions: Early oral feeding after pancreaticoenteric anastomosis is safe and feasible. It shortens the hospital stay without increasing other post-operative complication.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. New Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1605-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0901557

O’Neil SJ, Aranha GV. Lateral pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis. World J Surg. 2003;27:1196-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-7238-7

Hagopian EJ, Teixeira JA, Smith M, Steichen FM. Pancreatic pseudocyst treated by laparoscopic Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy: report of a case and review of the literature. Surgical Endos. 2000;14:967-. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640040010

Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):10-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea

Joliat GR, Martin D, Labgaa I, Melloul E, Uldry E, Halkic N, Fotsing G, Cristaudi A, Majno-Hurst P, Vrochides D, Demartines N. Early enteral vs. oral nutrition after Whipple procedure: Study protocol for a multicentric randomized controlled trial (NUTRIWHI trial). Frontiers in Oncol. 2022;12:855784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.855784

Bozzetti F, Mariani L. Perioperative nutritional support of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery in the age of ERAS. Nutrition. 2014;30(12):1267-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2014.03.002

Park JS, Chung HK, Hwang HK. Postoperative nutritional effects of early enteral feeding compared with total parental nutrition in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients: a prospective, randomized study. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(3):261-7.

Giacopuzzi S, Weindelmayer J, Treppiedi E, Bencivenga M, Ceola M, Priolo S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer: a single center experience. Dis Esophagus. 2017;1;30(4):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dow024

Willcutts KF, Chung MC, Erenberg CL, Finn KL, Schirmer BD, Byham-Gray LD. Early oral feeding as compared with traditional timing of oral feeding after upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):54-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001644

Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(3):623-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013

Gianotti L, Besselink MG, Sandini M, Hackert T, Conlon K, Gerritsen A, et al. Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: a position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2018;164(5):1035-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.040

Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CH, et al. Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37(3):230-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2013.01.003

Khan S, Ahmad I, Jamil T. Comparison between Early and Standard Oral Feeding After Emergency Bowel Surgery. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2024;16(08):716-716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22168716

Mazaki T, Ebisawa K. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature. J Gastroint Surg. 2008;12(4):739-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0362-1

Braunschweig CL, Levy P, Sheean PM, Wang X. Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. The Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(4):534-42.

Braga M, Gianotti L, Gentilini O, Parisi V, Salis C, Di Carlo V. Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2):242-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200102000-00003

Braga CL, Levy P, Sheean PM. Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. The American J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(4):534-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/74.4.534

Burcharth J, Falkenberg A, Schack A, Ekeloef S, Gögenur I. The effects of early enteral nutrition on mortality after major emergency abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. Clin Nutrition. 2021;40(4):1604-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.050

Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):961-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.170

Čečka F, Jon B, Čermáková E, Šubrt Z, Ferko A. Impact of postoperative complications on clinical and economic consequences in pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;90(1):21-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.1.21

Navez J, Hubert C, Dokmak S, De La Maza IF, Tabchouri N, Benoit O, et al. Early versus late oral refeeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy: a comparative Belgian-French study in two tertiary centers. J Gastroint Surg. 2020;24(7):1597-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04316-8

Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang CJ. Early versus traditional postoperative oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Digest Surg. 2013;30(3):225-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000353136

Perinel J, Mariette C, Dousset B, Sielezneff I, Gainant A, Mabrut JY, et al. Early enteral versus total parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized multicenter controlled trial (Nutri-DPC). Anna Surg. 2016;264(5):731-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001896

Das BC, Haque M, Uddin MS, Nur-E-Elahi M, Khan ZR. Effect of early and delay starting of enteral feeding in post-pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. Ann Hepato-biliary-panc Surg. 2019;23(1):56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.1.56

Ali I, Bhuvan XX. Comparative study of early vs late enteral feeding following intestinal anastomosis. Int J Sci Res. 2020;10:67-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.10.01.2020.p9711

Park JS, Chung HK, Hwang HK. Postoperative nutritional effects of early enteral feeding compared with total parental nutrition in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients: a prospective, randomized study. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(3):261-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2012.27.3.261

Gerritsen A, Wennink RA, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Tseng DS, Steenhagen E, et al. Early oral feeding after pancreatoduodenectomy enhances recovery without increasing morbidity. HPB. 2014;16(7):656-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12197

Chatterjee S, Bala SK, Chakraborty P, Dey R, Sinha S, Ray R, et al. A comparative study between early enteral feeding (within 24 hours) versus conventional enteral feeding after enteric anastomosis. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2012;11(4):273-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v11i4.12597

Lu JW, Liu C, Du ZQ, Liu XM, Lv Y, Zhang XF. Early enteral nutrition vs parenteral nutrition following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Experience from a single center. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(14):3821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3821

Rizk RB, Mahmoud MA, Mostafa HS, Ahmed AS. Comparative study between early versus late enteral nutrition after gastrointestinal anastomosis operations. Egyptian J Surg. 2023;42(3):828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_93_23

Imran A, Ismail M, Raza AA, Gul T, Khan A, Shah SA. A comparative study between the early and late enteral nutrition after gastrointestinal anastomosis operations. Cureus. 2024;16(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52686

Arif N, Ahmed RQ, Arif A, Zafar B, Shehzad F. Impact of early vs delayed oral feeding on hospital stay after caesarean section under regional anesthesia. Pakistan Arm Forces Med J. 2020;31(4):1138.

Negi A, Kumar D, Rajput NS. Early removal of nasogastric tube with early feeding versus conventional removal of nasogastric tube with delayed feeding after bowel anastomosis: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Int Surg J. 2019;6(4):1380-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20191282

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

Monda, S. R., Aman, A., Ullah, M. M., Ahmed, J., Khan, M. E. H., Chowdhury, A., & Qurashi, S. A. (2025). Complications between early and standard oral feeding after pancreatico-enteric anastomosis. International Surgery Journal, 12(7), 1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20251900

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles