Validation of the APPEND clinical decision tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20250811Keywords:
Acute appendicitis, APPEND score, Clinical decision tool, Negative appendicectomy rateAbstract
Background: The APPEND score is a clinical decision tool (CDT) for stratifying the risk of patients presenting with right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain having acute appendicitis. The aim of this study was to validate the APPEND score in an Australian metropolitan hospital population.
Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients from January to December 2024 at least 16 years of age that were referred to the general surgery service with acute RLQ pain in an Australian metropolitan hospital. The diagnostic properties including sensitivity, specificities, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) of the APPEND score were assessed and then compared with the Alvarado score. Agreement between the scores were also assessed.
Results: Of the 229 patients referred for acute RLQ pain, the APPEND score demonstrated high sensitivity of 98% in the low risk group identified with a score of 1 or less and a PPV of 100% in the high risk group (APPEND score ≥5. It has good agreement with the Alvarado score when identifying the low risk group (p=1) but low agreement when identifying the high risk group (p<0.001). The AUC was reasonable at 0.746 compared to the 0.823, p=0.02.
Conclusions: The APPEND score shows promise as a CDT for acute appendicitis in Australian metropolitan populations, potentially reducing negative appendectomy rates and radiological resources. While the APPEND score offers simplicity and strong performance, further multicenter validation is crucial before widespread clinical adoption in Australia.
Metrics
References
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2024. Admitted patients. Available at: https://www.aihw. gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/sectors/admitted-patients. Accessed on 25 February 2025.
Jearwattanakanok K, Yamada S, Suntornlimsiri W, Smuthtai W, Patumanond J. Clinical scoring for diagnosis of acute lower abdominal pain in female of reproductive age. Emerg Med Int. 2013;2013:730167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/730167
Colson M, Skinner KA, Dunnington G. High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. Am J Surg. 1997;174(6):723-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00183-9
Mariadason JG, Wang WN, Wallack MK, Belmonte A, Matari H. Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94(6):395-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221592131
Drake FT, Florence MG, Johnson MG, Jurkovich GJ, Kwon S, Schmidt Z, et al; SCOAP Collaborative. Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):586-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826a9602
Lee M, Paavana T, Mazari F, Wilson TR. The morbidity of negative appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(7):517-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/003588414X13946184903801
Reilly BM, Evans AT. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(3):201-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00009
Awayshih MMA, Nofal MN, Yousef AJ. Evaluation of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:15.
Mikaere H, Zeng I, Lauti M, Kularatna M, MacCormick AD. Derivation and validation of the APPEND score: an acute appendicitis clinical prediction rule. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(4):E303-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14022
Malik MU, Connelly TM, Awan F, Pretorius F, Fiuza-Castineira C, El Faedy O, et al. The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(4):491-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2713-4
Pitesa R, Hill AG, MacCormick AD. Modified APPEND Score for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in a New Zealand Pasifika Population. World J Surg. 2025;19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12510
Fagan PVB, Stanfield B, Korduke O, Henderson N, Kodeda K. Validation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score in a provincial population. Int Surg J. 2020;7:3540-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20204655
Pifeleti S, Hansell D, Kaspar A. Sensitivity and specificity of the Alvarado Score for the timely differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis for a case series in Samoa. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;73:103219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103219
Awayshih MMA, Nofal MN, Yousef AJ. Evaluation of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.34.15.17803
Al-Tarakji M, Zarour A, Singh R, Ghali MS. The Role of Alvarado Score in Predicting Acute Appendicitis and Its Severity in Correlation to Histopathology: A Retrospective Study in a Qatar Population. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e26902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26902
Polat Düzgün A, Pehlevan Özel H, Şahingöz E, Dinç T. Identification of complicated and non-complicated appendicitis: a new alvarado-based scoring system. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024;30(2):101-6.
Polat Düzgün A, Pehlevan Özel H, Şahingöz E, Dinç T. Identification of complicated and non-complicated appendicitis: a new alvarado-based scoring system. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024;30(2):101-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.70979
Amnedya TT, Wijaya S. Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of Alvarado score and TZANAKIS score in enforcement of acute appendicitis diagnosis. J Soc Sci. 2023;4(3):739-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v4i3.583
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
