Clinical profile and surgical management of primary vaginal hydrocele: our experience in a rural India

Authors

  • Mohd Hamid Shafique Ahmed Department of Surgery, Government Medical College Miraj, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Bankar S. S. Department of Surgery, Government Medical College Miraj, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Gosavi V. S. Department of Surgery, Government Medical College Miraj, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Dalavi S. B. Department of Surgery, Government Medical College Miraj, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Gurav P. D. Department of Surgery, Government Medical College Miraj, Miraj, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171615

Keywords:

Jaboulay's Procedure, Lord's Procedure, Primary vaginal hydrocele

Abstract

Background: Hydrocele is one of the commonest diseases occurring worldwide. Since olden days surgical procedures have been described for the treatment of hydrocele. Aim of the study was to analyse the clinical profile, diagnosis and surgical management of primary vaginal hydrocele in adults (>12 years)

Methods: A prospective study of 60 male patients of age range of more than 12 years with a history of scrotal swellings were studied for their clinical profiles, diagnosis and management. The study was carried out in Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India from November 2010 to November 2012. In the present study Jaboulay's Procedure was performed on 48 patients and Lord's Procedure was performed on 12 patients.

Results: The data was collected and results were analysed. Post-operatively about 1.6% of patients developed hematoma, 5% developed wound infection, 21.66% of the patients developed skin oedema and only 1 patient i.e 1.6 % had recurrence over a period of 2 years of follow up. Out of the total 60 patients,12 patients who underwent Lord's plication 8.33%,0%,0% developed skin oedema, hematoma and wound infection respectively as compared to 25%,2.08%,6.25% in the remaining 48 patients who underwent Jaboulay's procedure, respectively.

Conclusions: These two surgical procedures were very safe, easy to perform and economical and associated with minimal recurrence. Lord's procedure has lesser incidence of post-operative complications as compared to Jaboulay's procedure.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Das S. A Practical Guide to Operative Surgery. 3rd edition. 1995:489-90.

Rintoul RF. Churchill Livingstone, Farquharson’s Operative Surgery. 8th edition. 1995:678-80.

Lord PH. A Bloodless operation for the radical cure of Idiopathic Hydrocele. BJS. 1964;51:914-6.

Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK, O'Connell PR. The Testis and Scrotum, Bailey & Love's, Short Practice of Surgery. 25th edition, Arnold Publishers., London. 2000:1381-2.

Campbell MF. Hydrocele of tunica vaginalis- Study of 502 cases. SGO. 1927;45:192-200.

Dandapat MC, Mohapotro SK, Mohanty SS. The incidence of filaria as an aetiological factor for testicular hydrocele. Br J Surg. 1986;73:77-8.

Rodríguez WC, Rodríguez DD, Fortuño RF. The operative treatment of hydrocele: a comparison of 4 basic techniques. J Urol. 1981;125(6):804-5.

Efron G, Sharkey GG. The Lord operation for hydrocele. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967;125(3):603-6.

Dahl DS, Singh M, O'Conor VJ Jr, Sokol JK, Bulkley GJ. Lord's operation for hydrocele compared with conventional techniques. Arch Surg. 1972;104(1):40-1.

Rai S. Plication operation for hydrocele. IJS. 1978;40(9):481-4.

Agrawal OP. Radical cure of hydrocele by Lord's method as compared with eversion of the sac. IJS. 1983;45:329-31.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-22

How to Cite

Ahmed, M. H. S., S., B. S., S., G. V., B., D. S., & D., G. P. (2017). Clinical profile and surgical management of primary vaginal hydrocele: our experience in a rural India. International Surgery Journal, 4(5), 1653–1656. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171615

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles