Fluoroless versus conventional ureteroscopy: clinical outcomes, stone-free rate and complications

Ricardo C. Zorrilla; Carlos M. Arroyo; Rosa P. V. Vázquez; César E. V. Yañez; Pedro A. A. Bahena; Alec Anceno; Marco A. A. Martínez; Ricardo D. Castillo; Daniel A. Ramírez; Mauricio C. Orozco; Gerardo F. Noyola; Jorge G. M. Montor; Iñigo N. Ruesga; Carlos P. Gahbler

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20250807

Authors

Ricardo C. Zorrilla Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Carlos M. Arroyo Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Rosa P. V. Vázquez Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
César E. V. Yañez Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Pedro A. A. Bahena Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Alec Anceno Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Marco A. A. Martínez Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Ricardo D. Castillo Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Daniel A. Ramírez Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Mauricio C. Orozco Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Gerardo F. Noyola Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Jorge G. M. Montor Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Iñigo N. Ruesga Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
Carlos P. Gahbler Department of Urology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20250807

Keywords:

Lithiasis, Gahbler , Ureteroscopy, Retrograde intrarenal surgery, Radiation, Fluoroscopy

Abstract

Background: Urinary lithiasis is a prevalent condition worldwide, with recurrence rates up to 50% within five years. Ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are the preferred treatments for stones smaller than 20 mm, often involving radiation exposure. Fluoroless ureteroscopy (F-URS) has emerged as a potential method to reduce radiation-related risks for patients and healthcare personnel.

Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted, including patients over 18 years with ureteral or renal lithiasis treated with either F-URS (April 2022 to January 2023) or conventional ureteroscopy (C-URS) with fluoroscopy (January 2023 to January 2024). Data on stone-free rates (SFR), complications, surgical time, and radiation exposure were analyzed. Nominal variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, while numerical variables were analyzed using means and standard deviations. Statistical comparisons were made using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: A total of 369 patients were included: 164 (44.44%) in the F-URS group and 205 (55.56%) in the C-URS group. The overall SFR was 76.96% (80.49% in F-URS versus 74.15% in C-URS; OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.42-1.14, p=0.152). Surgical time was longer in the C-URS group (75.15±41.34 min) compared to the F-URS group (65.59±36.03 min). Complication rates were similar between groups (15.85% versus 12.20%; OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.33, p=0.313). Radiation exposure for fourth-year residents averaged 1.17 mGy, decreasing progressively with training level.

Conclusions: F-URS is a safe and effective technique for treating ureteral and renal lithiasis, with comparable SFR and complication rates to conventional ureteroscopy. The reduction in radiation exposure benefits both patients and surgical staff. Although current guidelines do not explicitly endorse F-URS, it should be considered in teaching hospitals and complex cases where radiation minimization is a priority.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ortegón-Gallareta R, Aguilar-Moreno J, Álvarez-Baeza A, Méndez-Domínguez N. Epidemiological profile of hospitalizations due to urolithiasis in the State of Yucatán, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Urología. 2019;79(5):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48193/rmu.v79i5.517

Peng L, Wang W, Gao X, Di X, Luo D. Fluoroless versus conventional ureteroscopy for urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(3):299-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04042-4

Qian X, Wan J, Xu J, Liu C, Zhong M, Zhang J, et al. Epidemiological Trends of Urolithiasis at the Global, Regional, and National Levels: A Population-Based Study. Wang Q, editor. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022:1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6807203

Abu Ahmed M, Abu Nasra W, Safadi A, Visoky A, Elias I, Katz R. Fluoroless Ureteroscopy: Experience in More Than 100 Patients. Isr Med Assoc J. 2022;24(1):47-51.

EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris. 2024. Available at: https://uroweb. org/guidelines/urolithiasis/chapter/citation-informat ion. Accessed on 25 January 2025.

Bragaru M, Popescu RI, Munteanu AM, Cozma C, Geavlete P, Geavlete B. Flexible Ureteroscopy Without Radiation Exposure. Maedica. 2023;18(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2023.18.2.203

Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, et al. International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int. 2023;131(2):153-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15836

De Coninck V, Keller EX, Somani B, Giusti G, Proietti S, Rodriguez-Socarras M, et al. Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview. World J Urol. 2020;38(9):2147-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03012-1

Bin Shaheen U, Ahmed Mahar N, Mughal N, Qureshi HH, Akhter N, Kalwar SR. Understanding ureteroscopy complications according to modified Clavien classification system. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.9250

Mandal S, Goel A, Singh MK, Kathpalia R, Nagathan DS, Sankhwar SN, et al. Clavien Classification of Semirigid Ureteroscopy Complications: A Prospective Study. Urology. 2012;80(5):995-1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.047

Subiela JD, Kanashiro A, Emiliani E, Villegas S, Sánchez-Martín FM, Millán F, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones. J Endourol. 2021;35(4):417-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0915

Hadjipavlou M, Lam V, Seth J, Anjum F, Sriprasad S. Radiation Exposure during Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Lithotripsy: An Analysis of Stone Characteristics. Urol Int. 2018;100(2):198-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000486345

Aliaga A, Avalos AV, Sanchez R, Rojas S, Aguila F, Marchant F. Fluoroscopy-free semirigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stone treatment: A prospective single-arm study of feasibility, efficacy, and safety. Urol Ann. 2023;15(3):304-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_181_20

Emiliani E, Kanashiro A, Chi T, Pérez-Fentes DA, Manzo BO, Angerri O, et al. Fluoroless Endourological Surgery for Stone Disease: a Review of the Literature—Tips and Tricks. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21(7):27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-00979-y

Bhanot R, Hameed ZBM, Shah M, Juliebø-Jones P, Skolarikos A, Somani B. ALARA in Urology: Steps to Minimise Radiation Exposure During All Parts of the Endourological Journey. Curr Urol Rep. 2022;23(10):255-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01102-z

Radiation Protection in Medicine. ICRP Publication 105. 2007;37(6):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2008.07.001

Laranjo Tinoco C, Coutinho A, Cardoso A, Araújo AS, Matos R, Anacleto S, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluoroless ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of urolithiasis: A comparative study. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2023;47(8):535-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.05.002