Comparative safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic and open appendectomy

Authors

  • Ganesh J. Shinde Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
  • Russell P. Pinto General Surgery Department, Holy Family Hospital, Bandar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20250552

Keywords:

Appendicitis, Clinical outcome, Comparison, Laparoscopic appendectomy, Open appendectomy

Abstract

Background: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency and the choice between laparoscopic and open appendectomy can significantly affect patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with these two surgical approaches.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Demographic and clinical characteristics including age distribution, type of appendicitis, leukocytes and additional surgical findings were evaluated. The two groups were evaluated and compared based on various postoperative outcomes. These included assessments of pain scores, opioid requirements, oral feeding tolerance, time taken to resume normal activities, length of hospital stay and overall expenses.

Results: This study included 100 appendicitis patients. The age distribution showed that young adults were most commonly affected. Laparoscopic appendectomy was linked to lower pain scores (2.77 vs 5.36 on day 0), reduced opioid requirement (6.7% vs 93.3%), faster oral feed tolerance (87% on day 0 vs 3% for open appendectomy) and quicker return to normal activity (2.42 days vs 5.15 days). Complications, such as wound infections and urinary retention, were lower in the laparoscopic group. However, the total cost of laparoscopic appendectomy is high.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy yields superior clinical outcomes, including reduced pain, fewer complications and faster recovery, despite being more costly than open appendectomy. These findings suggest that laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach for managing appendicitis when feasible.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gad KH, Mahmoud Al-Hefny AM, Eldin Abd-Elmonem AH, Yousef Kereet AM. Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy in Appendicitis Cases (Retrospective Comparative Study). QJM: An Int J Med. 2024;117(1):70-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.213

Rudrax Bhatt, Kanwar Singh Goel, Sapna Singla, Nikhil Goel, Manjith Tanwar. Comparison of post-operative recovery between open vs laparoscopic appendectomy. Int J Sci Res 2024;2:86-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr/6809361

Beltzer C, Haas F, Jahn LS, Bellmann V, Strohäker J, Willms A, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis—results of a propensity score matching analysis of 542 patients and consequences for the military surgeon. Mil Med. 2024;189(4):632-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usad356

Withers A, Loveland J. Demographics of paediatric patients presenting with acute appendicitis: A 5-year retrospective review of hospitals served by the Department of Paediatric Surgery at the University of the Witwatersrand. S Afr J Child Health. 2019;13(2):69-72.

Pereira B, Mendes CA, Ruano RM, Neves I, Curado RL, de Oliveira R, et al. Acute appendicitis may no longer be a predominant disease of the young population. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(4):283-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2019.87332

Armağan HH, Duman L, Cesur Ö, Karaibrahimoğlu A, Bilaloğlu E, Hatip AY, et al. Comparative analysis of epidemiological and clinical characteristics of appendicitis among children and adults. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg/Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021;27(5):45.

Harbrecht BG, Franklin GA, Miller FB, Smith JW, Richardson JD. Acute appendicitis—not just for the young. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):286-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.017

Chawngthu V. A Prospective Comparative Study of Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Single Unit Study. J Clin Med Imaging. 2022;6(22):1-5.

Resutra R, Salaria H, Gupta R. Retrospective analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Int Surg J. 2020;7(12):4045-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20205355

Stolyarov SA, Badyan HA, Popova MI, Mottoyan MA, Zimina OA, Ishutov I, et al. Comparative assessment of the results of performing an appendectomy open and laparoscopic access in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Bull Reavis Med Inst Rehabil, Doctor Health. 2021;2(50):42-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.2.CLIN.8

Harriott CB, Sadava EE. Management of complications after appendectomy: Literature Review. Curr Probl Surg. 2024;4:101505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101505

El Shayeb BH, Zakaria M, Matar M, Hany D. A prospective comparative study on appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis via open versus laparoscopic approach. Egypt J Surg. 2023;41(4):56.

Golub AV, Kozlov RS, Pleshkov VG, Moskalev AP, Alibegov RA, Chelombitko MA. Surgical site infections after open appendectomy and effectiveness of complex approach to their prevention. Khirurgiia. 2016;1(6):68-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2016668-76

Easwar N. A clinical study of post operative complications of emergency and elective (open & laparoscopic) appendicectomy (Doctoral dissertation, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli). 2014.

Akshitha G, Reddy MV, Ananthula A. Effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy in a tertiary care centre: a retrospective study. Int Surg J. 2023;10(4):614-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20230964

Guerrieri M, Baldarelli M, Crosta F, Marconi M, Rimini M, Organetti L, et al. Appendicectomy: laparoscopic or open approach. Minerva Chir. 2005;60(1):47-54.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Shinde, G. J., & Pinto, R. P. (2025). Comparative safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. International Surgery Journal, 12(3), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20250552

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles