An investigation into the frequency of negative appendectomies and contributing factors in patients with suspected acute appendicitis

Authors

  • M. Shahidul Islam Department of Colorectal Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Kazi Nasid Naznin Department of Colorectal Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Tanay Kumar Sarker Department of Colorectal Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Nusrat Jahan Department of Colorectal Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Muhammad Ali Siddiquee Department of Colorectal Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Nahid Reza Department of Surgeon, DGHS, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Aklima Parvin Faizi Department of Surgeon, DGHS, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mir Rasekh Alam Ovi Department of Surgeon, DGHS, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Ayesha Rahman Department of Surgeon, DGHS, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Sanjana Sharmin Shashi Department of Surgeon, DGHS, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20250143

Keywords:

Negative appendectomy, Acute appendicitis, Laparotomy

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain in young adults, with varying diagnosis accuracy leading to a significant rate of negative appendectomies, particularly in females and younger patients. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of negative appendectomy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Dhaka medical college hospital from January 2022 to June 2024, involving 220 patients diagnosed with suspected acute appendicitis. Clinical history, examination, and relevant pre-operative investigations were performed. All patients underwent surgery, and histopathological examination of the excised appendices was conducted.

Results: Acute appendicitis was confirmed in 175 patients (79.55%), with the highest incidence in individuals aged 10-19 years (54.1%). The negative appendectomy rate was 20.45%, with significantly higher rates in females (77.8%) compared to males (22.2%) (p=0.004). Younger patients (age <20 years) also showed a higher rate of negative appendectomy (33.3%) (p=0.012). Common presenting symptoms included anorexia (66.7%), elevated temperature (>99.4° F) (60%), and localized tenderness in the right iliac fossa (77.8%). Of the 64 patients who underwent pre-operative ultrasound, 63% experienced negative appendectomy. Histopathological examination revealed that 45 patients (20%) were diagnosed as not having appendicitis, with alternative conditions identified in several cases.

Conclusions: The study highlights a significant rate of negative appendectomies, particularly in younger females. While clinical judgment plays a crucial role in diagnosis, the findings suggest a need for enhanced diagnostic imaging techniques to reduce unnecessary surgical interventions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Burcharth BB. Incidence and trends of appendicitis in the United States: a population-based study. Am J Surg. 2011;6:740-6.

Singh GK. Diagnostic dilemma in appendicitis: A review. Indian J Surg. 2012;74(6):499-503.

De Castro, JWF. Appendicitis: An evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management. Int J Surg. 2013;11(3):223-9.

Weiser HJW. Negative appendicectomy: a review of the literature. Am J Surg. 2009;198(5):718-26.

Reiter PG. The significance of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Surgical Endoscopy. 2013;27(3):745-50.

Andersson JA. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in Sweden. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica. 1989;168:243-8.

Markar MP. Impact of imaging modalities on negative appendicectomy rates. Brit J Surg. 2016;103(5):613-8.

Johnson. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Clin Radioll. 1999;54(5):445-51.

Ershler HMR. WBC count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. J Am College Surgeons. 2001;192(5):571-6.

Thorsen SM. Appendicitis in women of childbearing age. Surgery. 2009;145(1):95-100.

Hickey CEG. The diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in the female patient. World J Surg. 2010;34(5):965-72.

Allard BJ. Negative appendicectomy rates: The role of laparoscopy and imaging. Am J Surg. 2012;204(2):226-9.

Lee DC. The role of clinical findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2004;139(1):31-6.

Wang HSN. Diagnosis of appendicitis: a systematic review. Surgical Clin N Am. 2009;89(4):791-805.

Luijendijk TPSCR. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. N Eng J Med. 2001;345(5):329-35.

Narasimhan MDC. Evaluation of acute abdomen in women: A prospective study. Indian J Surg. 2011;73(4):286-90.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-28

How to Cite

Islam, M. S., Naznin, K. N., Sarker, T. K., Jahan, N., Ali Siddiquee, M., Reza, N., Faizi, A. P., Ovi, M. R. A., Rahman, A., & Shashi, S. S. (2025). An investigation into the frequency of negative appendectomies and contributing factors in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. International Surgery Journal, 12(2), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20250143

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles