A study on various risk factors involved in benign gastrointestinal perforations in rural population of tri-state border

Authors

  • Arjun Karthik Muthukrishnan Venkatesan Department of General Surgery, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Abhiram Amudala Department of General Surgery, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Channanna Chidamber Rao Department of General Surgery, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Kavya Dasari Department of General Surgery, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20243985

Keywords:

Gastrointestinal perforation, Risk factors, Mortality, Laparotomy, Peritonitis, Prognosis

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal perforation is a common surgical emergency encountered by surgeons worldwide. Benign gastrointestinal perforations are especially prevalent in rural populations, leading to significant mortality and often requiring emergency surgery. This study was aimed to investigate the association of various risk factors of benign gastrointestinal perforations in the Tristate border of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, thereby assessing the prognosis and surgical outcome.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from March 2023 to March 2024 at the Department of General Surgery, PESIMSR, KUPPAM. The study included a total of 50 patients with perforation features, selected using purposive sampling technique. A detailed medical history was taken, physical examination and relevant investigations were conducted, and the findings were correlated with intraoperative and histopathology reports. The patients were followed up for complications. The data was analysed with appropriate statistical methods.

Results: Out of 50 patients, 72% were males and 28% were females. The most common age range of presentation was 41-50 years. The leading cause of perforation was peptic ulcer, accounting for 46% of cases, followed by appendicitis in 22% of cases, typhoid in 18% of cases, trauma in 12% of cases, and tuberculosis in 2% of cases.  Mortality was observed in 7 cases (14%). It's important to note that multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and mortality were linked to a higher Mannheim peritonitis prognostic index, indicating a poor prognosis.

Conclusion: Early diagnosis with risk factors assessment, immediate fluid resuscitation, and timely surgical intervention are crucial in significantly lowering the mortality rate associated with perforated peritonitis.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agarwal N, Saha S, Srivastava A, Chumber S, Dhar A, Garg S. Peritonitis- 10 years’ experience in a single surgical unit. Trop Gastroenterol. 2007;28(3)117-20.

Eid HO, Hefny AF, Joshi S, Zidan FM. Non traumatic perforation of the small bowel. Afr Health Sci. 2008;8:36-9.

Mukherjee S, Raza MA, Jindal R, Ratnakar R. A retrospective study of perforation peritonitis in a tertiary care hospital in Uttar Pradesh, India. Int Surg J. 2016;3(4):2074-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163576

Rajender Singh Jhobta, Ashok Kumar Attri, Robin Kaushik, Rajeev Sharma, Anupam Jhobta. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India: review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:26.

Meena LN, Jain S, Bajiya P. Gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis in India: A study of 442 cases. Saudi Surg J. 2017;5(3):116-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ssj.ssj_33_17

Notash AY, Salimi J, Rahimian H, Fesharaki MS, Abbasi A. Evaluation of Mannheim peritonitis index and multi organ failure score in patients with peritonitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2005;24:197-200.

Johnson CC, Baldessarre J, Levison ME. Peritonitis update on pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(6):1035 45, 1046-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/513658

Jhobta RS, Attri AK, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Jhobta A. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India: review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-1-26

Espinoza R, Rodriguez A. Traumatic and non traumatic perforations of hollow viscera. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(6):1291-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70618-6

Yadav D, Garg PK. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in delhi: 77 cases experience. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(2):133-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0609-2

Bali RS, Verma S, Agarwal PN, Singh R, Talwar N. Perforation peritonitis and the developing world. ISRN Surg. 2014;2014:105492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/105492

Nabi I, Munjewar C, Ranjan G, Gupta S, Ahirwar N, Chaudhary P, et al. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis at a tertiary healthcare centre: A prospective cohort study of 1908 cases. Hellenic Journal of Surg. 2016;88:181-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-016-0312-z

Hameed T, Kumar A, Sahni S, Bhatia R, Vidhyarthy AK. Emerging Spectrum of Perforation Peritonitis in Developing World. Front Surg. 2020;7:50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00050

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Venkatesan, A. K. M., Amudala, A., Chidamber Rao, C., & Dasari , K. (2024). A study on various risk factors involved in benign gastrointestinal perforations in rural population of tri-state border. International Surgery Journal, 12(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20243985

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles