Penile reconstruction post-oncologic surgery: comprehensive approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20242444Keywords:
Penile reconstruction, Penile cancer, Surgical techniques, Post-oncologic care, Quality of lifeAbstract
Post-oncologic penile reconstruction aims to restore penile form and function following surgical resection due to penile cancer. This reconstructive surgery is essential as treatments like partial or total penectomy can severely impact a patient’s quality of life. The primary goals include maintaining urinary and sexual function while achieving a cosmetically acceptable result. Techniques range from simple resurfacing of the glans to complex procedures like phalloplasty, while penile-sparing therapies, including topical treatments and laser ablation, are also used to minimize disfigurement. Penile cancer, predominantly squamous cell carcinoma, is rare but more prevalent in developing countries, with risk factors such as human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and poor hygiene. The preoperative evaluation involves assessing comorbidities, psychological state, and functional capacity to ensure optimal outcomes. Criteria for reconstruction include the extent of the defect, oncological status, and desired outcomes. Techniques employed in reconstruction include local, inguinal, anterolateral thigh, and myocutaneous flaps, as well as grafts and alloplastic materials. Innovations in surgical methodologies and multidisciplinary strategies have significantly improved outcomes. However, complications, including high perioperative morbidity, underscore the need for careful patient selection and management. Psychosocial support is crucial for optimal recovery and quality of life, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive, patient-centered approach in post-oncologic penile reconstruction. This holistic approach ensures that patients not only achieve cancer survival but also maintain a high quality of life following their treatment.
References
Beilan JA, Manimala NJ, Slongo J, Loeb A, Spiess PE, Carrion RE. Surgical Reconstruction After Penile Cancer Surgery. Curr Sexual Health Rep. 2017;9(4):224-31.
Brandes SB, Eswara JR. Penile and Inguinal Reconstruction and Tissue Preservation for Penile Cancer. In Brandes SB, Morey AF, Editors. Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery. Springer New York. 2014;653-73.
Blecher G, Almekaty K, Kalejaiye O, Minhas S. Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? F1000Res. 2017;6:1923.
Lubner MG, Marko J, Hu R, Kawashima A, Potretzke TA, Frazier AA, et al. Malignant Neoplasms of the Penis with Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2023;43(8):e230025.
Borque-Fernando Á, Gaya JM, Esteban-Escaño LM, Gómez-Rivas J, García-Baquero R, Agreda-Castañeda F, et al; Grupo Cooperativo de Registro Nacional Cáncer Pene (PIEM/AEU/2014/0002). Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Management of Penile Cancer: Results from the Spanish National Registry of Penile Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(3):616.
Bhambhvani HP, Greenberg DR, Parham MJ, Eisenberg ML. A population-level analysis of nonsquamous penile cancer: The importance of histology. Urol Oncol. 2021;39(2):136.
Teixeira Júnior AAL, da Costa Melo SP, Pinho JD, Sobrinho TBM, Rocha TMS, Duarte DRD, et al. A comprehensive analysis of penile cancer in the region with the highest worldwide incidence reveals new insights into the disease. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):1063.
Fu L, Tian T, Yao K, Chen XF, Luo G, Gao Y, et al. Global Pattern and Trends in Penile Cancer Incidence: Population-Based Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(7):e34874.
Chadha J, Chahoud J, Spiess PE. An update on treatment of penile cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221127254.
Nidadavolu LS, Ehrlich AL, Sieber FE, Oh ES. Preoperative Evaluation of the Frail Patient. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(6):1493-503.
Demirkol MK. Evaluation of preoperative anxiety level of urological surgery patients and the effect of surgical informing. Southern Clin Istanbul Eurasia. 2019;30(4):337-42.
Pérez-Niño J, Fernández N, Sarmiento G. Partial penectomy and penile reconstruction. Initial surgical management of localized penile cancer. Actas Urol Esp. 2014;38(1):62-5.
Ottenhof SR, Leone A, Djajadiningrat RS, Azizi M, Zargar K, Kidd LC, et al. Surgical and Oncological Outcomes in Patients After Vascularised Flap Reconstruction for Locoregionally Advanced Penile Cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(5):867-74.
Brodbeck R, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Beier JP. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Treatment of Oncological Perineal and Genital Defects. Front Oncol. 2015;5:212.
Ralph DJ. Phallic Reconstruction Following Surgery for Penile Cancer. In Muneer A, Arya M, Horenblas S, Editors. Textbook of Penile Cancer. Springer London. 2011;237-57.
Chavarriaga J, Becerra L, Camacho D, Godoy F, Forero J, Cabrera M, et al. Inverted urethral flap reconstruction after partial penectomy: Long-term oncological and functional outcomes. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(4):169.e13-e20.
Coddington ND, Redger KD, Higuchi TT. Surgical principles of penile cancer for penectomy and inguinal lymph node dissection: A narrative review. AME Med J. 2021;6:29.
Wang P, Fan Y, Lian W, Su Y, Xiao H, Jia C. Satisfactory Wound Reconstruction with a Local Rotation Flap After Removal of Large Penile Divided Nevi: Original Technique, Early and Mid-Term Results. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:2203-10.
Munnangi A, Dravid C, Gatla NR, Ram PS, Mahantshetty U. Utility of local flaps in the reconstruction of oncologic resection defects of the oral cavity. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;9(1):48.
Azevedo RA, Roxo AC, Alvares SHB, Baptista DP, Favorito LA. Use of flaps in inguinal lymphadenectomy in metastatic penile cancer. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47(6):1108-19.
Schaffer C, Haselbach D, Schiraldi L, Sörelius K, Kalbermatten DF, Raffoul W, et al. Abdominal-based adipocutaneous advancement flap for reconstructing inguinal defects with contraindications to standard reconstructive approaches: a simple and safe salvage reconstructive option. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(4):395-403.
Koifman L, Hampl D, Ginsberg M, Castro RB, Koifman N, Ornellas P, et al. The role of primary inguinal surgical debulking for locally advanced penile cancer followed by reconstruction with myocutaneous flap. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47(6):1162-75.
Tomczak S, Abellan-Lopez M, de Villeneuve Bargemon JB, Bertrand B, Casanova D. Reconstruction of penile skin loss by superficial circumflex iliac perforator (SCIP) pedicled flap after Fournier's gangrene. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2024;69(3):217-21.
Rossi SA, Martineau JJC, Guillier D, Hübner M, Hahnloser D, Raffoul W, et al. Outcomes of the Composite Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Perineal Reconstruction After Postoncological Abdominoperineal Resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022;65(3):373-81.
di Summa PG, Sapino G, Bauquis O. Total Urethra and Penile Shaft Reconstruction with Combined Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap and Radial Forearm Free Flap after Total Penectomy. Arch Plast Surg. 2022;49(3):448-52.
Brunetti B, Salzillo R, Tenna S, Morelli Coppola M, Persichetti P. Versatility of the lateral circumflex femoral artery sparing perforator-based anterolateral thigh flaps in loco-regional thigh reconstruction after skin cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma resection. Microsurgery. 2022;42(5):428-32.
Alnajjar HM, Randhawa K, Muneer A. Localized disease: Types of reconstruction/plastic surgery techniques after glans resurfacing/glansectomy/ partial/total penectomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):213-7.
Furlow WL. Penile Prostheses: Current Applications. In Porst H, Editor. Penile Disorders. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 1997;277-90.
Kristinsson S, Johnson M, Ralph D. Review of penile reconstructive techniques. Int J Impot Res. 2021 33(3):243-50.
Manimala NJ, Nealon SW, Heinsimer KR, Wiegand LR. Advances in penile reconstructive techniques for primary penile tumors. AME Med J. 2019;4:43.
Benjamin H, Celine A, Mounia SM, Barbara H, Jean Paul M. Ethical stakes of penile transplantation: A literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(5):1529-36.
Hinderer UT. Functional and Aesthetic Results in Hypospadias Repair with Hinderer’s Techniques. Aesth Plast Surg. 2000;24(5):323-43.
Obiora D, Yang H, Gor RA. Robotic assisted reconstruction for complications following urologic oncologic procedures. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(5):2272-9.
Schneider M, Hübner M, Becce F, Koerfer J, Collinot JA, Demartines N, et al. Sarcopenia and major complications in patients undergoing oncologic colon surgery. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(6):1757-63.
Langston JP, Muneer A, Garaffa G, Ralph D. Complications of Penile Prosthesis Surgery. In Muneer A, Pearce I, Ralph D, Editors. Prosthetic Surgery in Urology. Springer International Publishing. 2016;223-34.
Rosenberger PH, Jokl P, Ickovics J. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(7):397-405.
Turns D. Psychosocial issues: Pelvic exenterative surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76(3):224-36.
