Comparison between the outcome of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20242109Keywords:
Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreaticogastrostomy, Pancreaticojejunostomy, Pancreatic fistula, AnastomosisAbstract
Background: Complications of pancreatic stump reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can lead to severe morbidity or even mortality. This study is taken to see the postoperative outcome of pancreatico-gastrostomy (PG) over pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after PD. Aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of PG and PJ following PD in a cross-sectional analysis.
Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was done in the department of hepatobiliary pancreatic and liver transplant surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka. A total of twenty-five patients (N=25), who underwent PD from July 2019 to June 2020, were included in this study. These patients were divided into two group, group A with PG (n=10) and group B with PJ (n=15). All patients were evaluated before and after surgery for assessing post-operative outcome by clinically, biochemically and radiologically.
Results: This study showed no significant differences in demographic characteristics, co-morbidity and post-operative outcomes/complications between this two groups. However, PG demonstrated significantly shorter anastomosis time and required fewer sutures than PJ. Although a higher incidence of wound infections was observed in PJ compared to PG, these differences were not statistically significant. Peri-operative mortality did not significantly differ between the two techniques. Though postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the PG group compared to PJ but the difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: PG can be considered as a safe and alternative procedure after PD.
Metrics
References
Ahmed M, Hussain SM. Pancreaticojejunostomy or Pancreaticogastrostomyto prevent pancreatic fistula formation after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2016;66(1):68-70.
Aroori S, Puneet P, Bramhall SR, Muiesan P, Mayer AD, Mirza DF, et al. Outcomes comparing a pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and a pancreatico-jejunostomy (PJ) after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(10):723-31.
Qin H, Luo L, Zhu Z, Huang J. Pancreaticogastrostomy has advantages over pancreaticojejunostomy on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2016;36:18-24.
Cattell RB. A technic for pancreatoduodenal resection. Surg Clin North Am. 1948;28(3):761-75.
Tersigni R, Capaldi M, Ialongo P, Grillo LR, Anselmo A. Surgical treatment of the pancreatic stump: preventive strategies of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. G Chir. 2014;35(9-10):213-22.
Conzo G, Gambardella C, Tartaglia E, Sciascia V, Mauriello C, Napolitano S, et al. Pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the management of pancreatic stump. Literature review. Int J Surg. 2015;21(1):S4-9.
Zhou Y, Yu J, Wu L, Li B. Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejuno-stomy on occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Asian J Surg. 2015;38(3):155-60.
Kostov DV, Kobakov G, Yankov D. Pancreatogastrostomy with one continuous seromuscular circular suture. Int J Surg Med. 2015;1(1):2-6.
Yeo CJ. Management of Complications Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Clin. 1995;75(5):913-24.
Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM. Pancreatico-duodenectomy: time to change our approach? The Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):573-5.
Tan WJ, Kow AW, Liau KH. Moving towards the New International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions in pancreatico-duodenectomy: a comparison between the old and new. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(8):566-72.
Lei P, Fang J, Huang Y, Zheng Z, Wei B, Wei H. Pancreaticogastrostomy or pancreaticojejunostomy? Methods of digestive continuity reconstruction after pancreaticodudenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1444-9.
Hosotani R, Doi R, Imamura M. Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy reduces the risk of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2002;26(1):99-104.
Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH. Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;221(6):635-48.
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenec-tomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222(4):580-92.
Fang WL, Shyr YM, Su CH, Chen TH, Wu CW, Lui WY. Comparison between pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduo-denectomy. J Formosan Med Assoc. 2007;106(9):717-27.
Amutha P, Lakshminarayanan M, Muppalla NVN. Pancreaticogastrostomy Versus Binding Pancrea-ticojejunostomy after Pancreaticoduodenec-tomy: A Comparative study (Doctoral dissertation, Madurai Medical College, Madurai). IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(8):48-52.
Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J. Pancreaticogastrostomyis superior to pancreatico-jejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):882-7.
Aroori S, Puneet P, Bramhall SR, Muiesan P, Mayer AD, Mirza DF, et al. Outcomes comparing a pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and a pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after apancreatico-duodenectomy (PD). HPB. 2011;13(10):723-31.