Comparison of postoperative outcome of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia mesh repair

Authors

  • Santosh Duwal Department of General Surgery, NAMS, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Kishor Manandhar Department of General Surgery, NAMS, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241734

Keywords:

Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic hernioplasty, Open hernioplasty

Abstract

Background: The surgical history of inguinal hernia dates back to Egypt, from Bassini’s repair to today’s mesh based open and laparoscopic repair. Still superiority of laparoscopic over open repair is controversial. However laparoscopic technique was reported to be better in term of post-operative pain and early return to work.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional observational study was performed in Bir Hospital from August 2020 to January 2021. Sample size was 56. Hospital ethical committee approval and written informed consent from patients was obtained. Convenient sampling was done and data analyzed with SPSS ver. 23 and Microsoft excel 2010.

Results: 26 patients each were allotted to two group: laparoscopic hernia (LH) and open hernia (OH). The mean age was 50.50±17.20 years. LH group had significantly less postoperative pain than the OH group on 12, 24 and 48 hours (p<0.05). Although the vas pain scores of LH group were also comparatively lower on 0 hour, these differences were not statistically significant. The mean hospital stay after surgery was less for LH group (2.14±0.356 vs 2.43±0.356) but was not statistically significant. (p=0.286). Although more post-operative complications were seen in OH group, these were not statistically significant (p values for wound infection 0.491, for scrotal swelling 0.193). LH group had significant early return to work than OH group (13.32±2.109 vs 21.21±5.354 days) with p value 0.000.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is better than open inguinal hernia repair in terms of less post-operative pain and early return to work.

References

Zendejas B, Hernandez-Irizarry R, Ramirez T, Lohse CM, Grossardt BR, Farley DR. Relationship between body mass index and the incidence of inguinal hernia repairs: a population-based study in Olmsted County, MN. Hernia. 2014;18(2):283-8.

Shrestha SK, Sharma VK. Outcome of Lichtenstein operation: a prospective evaluation of sixty-four patients, Nepal Medical College Journal, 2006;8(4):230-3.

Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. American journal of epidemiology. 2007;165(10):1154-61.

Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T, Kuchena A, Ali SM, Hernandez-Irizarry R, et al. Incidence of inguinal hernia repairs in Olmsted County, MN: a population-based study. Annals of surgery. 2013;257(3):520.

Johnson J, Roth JS, Hazey JW. The history of open inguinal hernia. Curr surg, 2004;61(1):49-50

Laparoscopic Hernia Repair, SAGES. Available at: sages.org/wiki/laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair. Accessed on 3 May 2024.

Neumayer L, Giobbie Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, et al. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernias. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1819-27.

Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK. Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extra peritoneal versus open Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(6):850-6.

Colak T, Akca T, Kanik A, Aydin S. Randomized clinical trail comparing laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal approach with open mesh repair in inguinal hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech. 2003;13(3):191-5.

EU Hernia Trailists collaboration. Laparoscopic compared with open metthods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trails. British Journal of Surgery. 2000;87:860-7.

McCormack K1, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD001785.

Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O. Open Mesh versus Laparoscopic Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia. N England J Med. 2004;350:18.

Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJE, Praseedom RK. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 2010;97:4–11.

Rajan K, Bhakta KR, Balaram M, Yashad D, Bikram TK. Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal Mesh Repair versus Lichtenstein’s Hernioplasty. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017;15(36):135-40.

Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18:151–63.

Kockerling F, Stechemesser B, Hukauf M, Kuthe A, Schug-Pass C. TEP versus Lichtenstein: which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men? Surg Endosc. 2015;12:3-1.

Garg P, Pai SA, Vijaykumar H. Comparison of early postoperative outcome of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia mesh repair. Int Surg J. 2018;5(8):2732-6.

Elwan A, Abomera M, Makarem M, Mohammedain A. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal reapir versus open preperitoneal mesh reapir for inguinal hernia. J Arab Scc Med Res. 2013;8:38-42.

Zheng Bobo, Wang Nan, Qiao Qin, Wu tao, Lu Jianguo, He Xianli. Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Lichtenstein and Totally Extra-peritoneal Laparoscopic Hernioplasty in Treatment of Inguinal Hernias. J Surg Res. 2014;14:545-9.

Stoker DL, Spiegelhalter DJA, Singh R, Wellwood JM. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomized prospective trail. Lancet J. 1994;343:1243-5.

Wilson MS, Deans GT, Brough WA. Prospective trial comparing Lichtenstein with laparoscopic tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1995;82:274-7.

Rathod CM, Karvande R, Jena J, Ahire MKD. A comparative study between laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and open inguinal hernia repair. Int Surg J. 2016;3(4):1861-7.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles