Functional outcome of conservative versus plate osteosynthesis in displaced midshaft clavicle fracture in manual labours
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170529Keywords:
Clavicle fracture, Manual laboursAbstract
Background: Clavicle fracture is a one of most common shoulder injury which is commonly treated conservatively. Operative methods are used for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced fracture shaft clavicle with better functional outcome preserving the shoulder biomechanics needed for overhead manual workers. This study is aimed at study of functional outcome of different modalities of treatment used in treatment of displaced fracture midshaft clavicle in manual laborers.
Methods: This study was conducted with permission of ethical committee in B.R.D Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. This study included 36 patients with closed displaced fracture midshaft fractures. Out of 36patients, 17 were treated conservatively using clavicle brace and sling and 19 patients were treated operatively by open reduction and internal fixation using reconstruction plate or AO pre-contoured plate. All patients were followed clinically and radiologically, regularly at 1 month duration for 18 months. Functional outcome both, conservative and operatively treated patients were assessed using constant and murley scoring system.
Results: 17 patients treated conservatively had good to average functional results and 19 patients treated surgically had excellent functional outcome at 4 weeks of the treatment. At 12 weeks all fractures united well in operative group patients had better functional outcome with good range of shoulder abduction than conservative group of patients where in 4 patients fractures did not united and later underwent operative treatment to achieve fracture union. Average time of fracture healing in operative group was 8 weeks, less than time average time (12 weeks) taken by fracture healing in conservatively treated patients. Complication rate in conservatively treated group was tenting of skin and formation of discharging wound later, malunion, delayed fracture healing leading to shoulder stiffness and decreased shoulder abduction. Wound infection, implant failure or wound dehiscence like common complications were not seen in operative group.
Conclusions: In manual laborers, clavicle fractures treated operatively had united early with excellent functional outcome and better shoulder abduction and early return to work with no complications in comparison to fractures treated conservatively.
Metrics
References
Craig EV, Basamania CJ, Rockwood CA. Fractures of the clavicle. In Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, Wirth MA, Lippitt SB, editors, The shoulder. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders. 2004;455-519.
Jupiter JB, Leffert RD. Non-union of the clavicle associated complications and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surgery. 1987;69:753-60.
Hill JM, Mcguire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surgery. 1997;79:537-40.
Chen CH, Chen IC, Wang C. Semi tubular plates for acutely displaced midclavicular fractures: a retrospective study of 111 patients followed for 2.5 to 6 years. I Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:463-6.
Lazarus MD. Fractures of the Clavicle. In: Bucholz RW and Heckman JD, editors, Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 5th edition, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2001;1041-78.
Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80:476-84.
Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clinical Orthopaedics Related Research. 1987;214:160-4.
Creashaw AH. Fractures of shoulder, arm and forearm. In: Canale ST, editor. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 10th edition. St. Louis Mosby. 2003;2985-3071.
Nordgvist A, Petersson CJ, Johnell I. Mid clavicular fractures in adults: end result study after conservative treatment. Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:572-6.
Robinson CM, Court Brown. CM, Mcqueen MM, Walkefield AE. Estimating the risk of non-union following non-operative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surgery. 2004;86:1359-65.
Solheim K, Vaage S. Delayed union and nonunion of fractures: clinical experience with the ASIF method. J Trauma. 1973;13:121-8.
Kulshrestha V, Roy T, Audige L. Operative versus nonoperative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a prospective cohort study. I Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:1-8.
Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Plate fixation of fresh displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Injury 1999;30(7):497.