Rib resection versus rib division in two-stage oesophagectomies: a retrospective cohort study

Authors

  • Alexander Yuen Department of Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8469-6188
  • Jessica Ng Department of Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9538-4435
  • Leigh Rutherford Department of Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5597-4847
  • David Parker Department of Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
  • Philip Townend Department of Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7800-9660

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240162

Keywords:

Oesophagectomy, Rib resection, Rib division, Oesophageal carcinoma, Two-stage oesophagectomy, Analgesic requirement

Abstract

Background: Rib resection (removal of a portion of one rib) and rib division are different approaches used to gain exposure and access to the thoracic cavity in the two-stage oesophagectomy. The analgesic requirement, respiratory complications and physiotherapy and rehabilitation requirements of rib resection and rib division in two-stage oesophagectomy procedures for oesophageal carcinoma were compared.

Methods: Patients who underwent two-stage oesophagectomy between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively identified. The patients were analysed in a rib resection group (n=14) and a rib division group (n=14) with regards to patient demographics, engagement with the institution’s acute pain service, analgesic requirement, incidence of pneumonia, physiotherapy and rehabilitation requirements.

Results: The overall amount of opioid analgesia used was greater in the rib division group compared to the rib resection group (674.6 versus 528.0 mg, p=0.3799). There were no significant differences in the incidence of pneumonia between the two groups (n=4 versus 1, p=0.3259). There was a trend towards longer ventilation times (0.643 versus 0.357 days, p=0.3333), increased physiotherapy (9.93 versus 9.71 days, p=0.4700), rehabilitation requirements (n=0 versus 2, p=0.1422) within the rib division compared to the rib resection group.

Conclusions: The differences in outcomes between the rib resection and rib division groups are not statistically significant and have been shown to be non-inferior in this dataset. The choice of approach should be based on individual patient factors and the surgeon's preference.

References

Oesophageal cancer statistics. (2022, March 2). WCRF International. Available at: https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/oesophageal-cancer-statistics/. Accessed in 2 January 2024.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022, April 10). Cancer data in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/data. Accessed in 2 January 2024.

Smyth EC, Lagergren J, Fitzgerald RC, Lordick F, Shah MA, Lagergren P, et al. Oesophageal cancer. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers. 2017;3:17048.

Hii MW, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Thomas JM, Thomson I, Martin I, et al. Impact of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(1):95–104.

Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TN, Harpole DH Jr, et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thora Surg. 2004;78(4):1170–6.

Aurello P, Magistri P, Berardi G, Petrucciani N, Sirimarco D, Antolino L, et al. Transthoracically or transabdominally: how to approach adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and cardia. A meta-analysis. Tumori. 2016;102(4):352–60.

Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 1946;34:18–31.

Chin EF. Special care after thoracotomy. Postgraduate Med J. 1957;33(386):612–7.

Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. (2021). Opioid Dose Equivalence Calculation Table. Faculty of Pain Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Available at: https://www.anzca. edu.au/resources/professional-documents/standards-(1)/pm01-appendix-2-opioid-dose-equivalence.pdf. Accessed in 2 January 2024.

Welcome to the Tidyverse. (n.d.). Retrieved August 5, 2023, Available at: https://tidyverse.tidyverse. org/articles/paper.html. Accessed in 2 January 2024.

Sabanathan S. Has postoperative pain been eradicated? Ann Royal Coll Surgeons England, 1997;77(3):202.

Visser E, Marsman M, van Rossum PSN, Cheong E, Al-Naimi K, van Klei WA, et al. Postoperative pain management after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(10):1-11.

Avendano CE, Flume PA, Silvestri GA, King LB, Reed CE. Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002:73(3):922-6.

Ferguson MK, Celauro AD, Prachand V. Prediction of major pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2011;91(5):1494-501.

Fagevik Olsen M, Wennberg E, Johnsson E, Josefson K, Lönroth H, ET AL. Randomized clinical study of the prevention of pulmonary complications after thoracoabdominal resection by two different breathing techniques. J Br Surg. 2002;89(10):1228-34.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles