Assessment of standardization in surgical skin preparation:does a compliance-culture exist?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20160208Keywords:
Standardization, Skin-preparation, Compliance, Compliance-culture, QualityAbstract
Background: Proper and adequate surgical site preparation is a vital part of reducing postoperative morbidity, mortality, and overall health care costs. A major key to improve quality-of-care is the compliance with standardized procedures that reduce variations.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study in 257 hospitals across the US to assess standardization-rates of surgical-site skin-preparation. The adequacy of surgical skin-prepping duration and the drying-time as defined by the directions-for-use of each product were assessed.
Results: Our results showed a 24.6% compliance rate with both application and dry times, while 38.8% of hospitals were noncompliant with either application-time or dry-time. The use of a single-step applicator, a central-to-peripheral application, chlorhexidine-alcohol, and performing a single prep were correlated with higher compliance rates. The use of a 2-step application, aqueous-chlorhexidine, iodine, iodine-alcohol, and performing two or more total preps all showed a higher correlation with overall non-compliance. The compliance with adequate prep-time or dry-time was significantly correlated with higher compliance with both variables.
Conclusions: Among hospitals included in this study, the compliance rates with standardized recommendations were low and might be an indicator to drawbacks that extend beyond the act of skin preparation. The adequacy of skin preparation might be an indicator of the status of a compliance-culture and of the delivered–care quality.
Metrics
References
Fry DE. Surgical site infections and the surgical care improvement project (SCIP): evolution of national quality measures. Surgical infections. 2008;9(6):579-84.
Auerbach A. Healthcare quality measurement in orthopaedic surgery: current state of the art. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2009;467(10):2542-7.
Tang YH, Wong WK, Wong HL. Patellar clunk syndrome in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised versus cruciate-substituting prostheses. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014;22(1):80-3.
Lee KK BS, Hobson DB, Demski RJ, Yang T, Wick EC. Building a business case for colorectal surgery quality improvement. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(11):1298-303.
Potenza BDM, Estigoy B, Faraday E, Snyder A, Angle N, Schwartz A, et al. Lessons learned from the institution of the Surgical Care Improvement Project at a teaching medical center. Am J Surg. 2009;198(6):881-8.
Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2012;215(2):193-200.
Diana MHM, Eisenring MC, Zanetti G, Troillet N, Demartines N. Measures to Prevent Surgical Site Infections: What Surgeons (Should) Do. World J Surg. 2011;35(2):280-8.
Bratzler DW. The Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: promises and pitfalls. The American surgeon. 2006;72(11):1010-16.
Edwards M, Purpura J, Kochvar G. Quality improvement intervention reduces episodes of long-term acute care hospital central line-associated infections. American journal of infection control. 2014;42(7):735-8.
Services CfMaM. National Health Expenditure projections 2013-2023. National Health Expenditure
Data. 2015. Accessed February 9, 2015.
Attarian DE, Wahl JE, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP. Developing a high-efficiency operating room for total joint arthroplasty in an academic setting. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2013;471(6):1832-6.
Porras-Hernandez JB, Tovilla-Mercado J, Vilar-Compte D, Nieto-Zermeño J, Davila-Perez R, Teyssier-Morales G, et al. A standardized perioperative surgical site infection care process among children with stoma closure: a before-after study. World J Surg. 2008;32(10):2316-23.
Yokoe DS, Mermel LA, Anderson DJ. A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2008;29(1):S12-21.
How-to Guide: Prevent Surgical Site Infections. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 2012. (Available at www.ihi.org).
Nicolay CR, Purkayastha S, Greenhalgh A. Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare. The British journal of surgery. 2012;99(3):324-35.
Carayon P, Hundt SA, Karsh BT. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Quality & safety in health care. 2006;15,(1):50-8.
Muilwijk J, van den Hof S, Wille JC. Associations between surgical site infection risk and hospital operation volume and surgeon operation volume among hospitals in the Dutch nosocomial infection surveillance network. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2007;28(5):557-63.
Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. Jama. 2006;295(16):1912-20.
Bozic KJ, Maselli J, Pekow PS, Lindenauer PK, Vail TP, Auerbach AD. The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. 2010;92(16):2643-52.
Ballard DJ, Ogola G, Fleming NS. The Impact of Standardized Order Sets on Quality and Financial Outcomes. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches. Rockville 2008;2.
Ballard DJ, Ogola G, Fleming NS. Impact of a standardized heart failure order set on mortality, readmission, and quality and costs of care. International journal for quality in health care: journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua. 2010;22(6):437-44.