Study of comparison of high resolution sonography and computed tomography in evaluation of abdominal tuberculosis among patients in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Authors

  • Ayanat Husain Department of Surgery, Integral Institute of Medical Science and Research, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Huma Firdaus Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ERA's Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Piyush Pandey Department of Surgery, ERA's Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181388

Keywords:

Abdominal tuberculosis, Computed tomography, High resolution USG

Abstract

Background: Despite individual evaluation of USG and CT scan in diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis, there is limited literature available comparing the two methods. The present study was done to evaluate high resolution sonography and computed tomography in abdominal tuberculosis.

Methods: A total of 55 clinically suspected adult cases of abdominal tuberculosis were enrolled in this prospective observational study after taking informed consent in a tertiary hospital of Lucknow. SPSS software version 15.0 statistical analysis software was used for data analysis.

Results: The prevalence of abdominal tuberculosis among clinically suspected cases of abdominal tuberculosis was 77.8%. High resolution USG was 77.8% sensitive and 70% specific in diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. It provided a high efficacy in detection of intestinal tuberculosis but failed to provide a significant discriminatory difference between abdominal tuberculosis positive and negative cases for extra intestinal tuberculosis. Computed tomography was 35.3% sensitive and 80% specific in diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. It provided an excellent accuracy in diagnosing intestinal tuberculosis as well as extra-intestinal tuberculosis. The accuracy level of CT (90.9%) was found to be higher as compared to that of HR-USG (76.4%) and the difference was significant statistically too (p=0.039).

Conclusions: Computed tomography is useful in diagnosis of both intestinal and extra-intestinal abdominal tuberculosis and can be recommended for use in routine practice.

References

Jain R, Sawhney S, Bhargava DK, Berry M. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: sonographic findings in patients with early disease. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(6):1391-5.

Kapoor VK. Abdominal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 1998;74(874):459-67.

Suri R, Gupta S, Suri R. Computed tomography in abdominal tuberculosis: pictorial review. Br J Radiol 1999;72(853):92-8.

Rai S, Thomas WM. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: the importance of laparoscopy. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(12):586-8.

Wilairatana P, Wilairatana S, Lekhyananda S, Charoenlarp P. does laparoscopy have a limited role in diagnosis of fibroadhesive tuberculous peritonitis? Southeast Asian J Trop Med Publ Health 1993;24(4):762-5.

Petrou M, Vessiliou V. Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis J. R. Soc. Med 2004;97(3):155.

Hewavithana PB. Abdominal tuberculosis. Biomed imaging interv J 2007;3(1):e12-112.

Yu R, Tong B, Li r. Imaging diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis . Zhonghua Jia He Hu Xi Za Zhi .2001; 24(7):404-6.

Agarwal D, Narayan S, Chakravarty. J, Sunder S. ultrasonography for diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis in HIV infected peaple. Indian J Med Res 2010;132:77-80.

Patel MN, Beningfield S, Burch V. abdominal and pericardial ultrasound in suspected extrapulmonary or disseminated tuberculosis. S Afr Med J. 2011;101(1):39-42.

Zissin R, Gayer G, Chowers M, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Kots E, Hertz M. computerized tomography findings of abdominal tuberculosis: report of 19 cases. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001;3(6):414-8.

Oya Uygur-bayramicli, Gul Dabak, Resat. A clinical dilemma: abdominal tuberculosis. World J Gastroentrol 2003;9(5):1098-01.

World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2013. Geneva: WHO. 23 Oct; 2013. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/91355/1/9789241564656_eng.pdf.

Khan SM, Khan KM, Khan AS, Jehanzeb M, Jan WA. Khan M ET AL. Presentation of abdominal tuberculosis in NWFP and its correlation with operative findings. J Postgard Med Inst 2005, 19:286-91.

Chalya PL, Mchembe MD, Mshana SE, Rambau PE ,Jaka H, Mabula JB. Cllinicopathological profile and surgical treatment of abdominal tuberculosis: a single center experience in northwestern Tanzania. BMC Infectius Diaeases 2013,13(1):270.

Lee SW, Kang YA, Yoon YS, UM SW, LEE SM, Yoo CG et al The prevalence and evolution of anemia associated with tuberculosis. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21(6):1028-32.

Epstein BM, Mann JH. CT of abdominal tuberculosis. Amer J Roentgenol. 1982;139:861-6.

Sheikh M., Abu-Zidan F., Al-Hilaly M. Behbehani A. Abdominal tuberculosis: Comparison of sonography and computed tomography. J. Clin. Ultrasound.1995;23(7): 413-7.

Gulati MS, Sarma D, paul SB. CT Appearances in abdominal tuberculosis: a pictorial essay. Clinical Imaging. 1999;23(1):51-9.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-21

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles