DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175553

Desarda’s versus Lichtenstein technique of inguinal hernia repair

Obaid Syed

Abstract


Background: Ideal method for modern hernia surgery should be simple, cost effective, safe, tension free and permanent. The Lichtenstein operation to a great extent achieves this entire goal. The Lichtenstein mesh repair is associated with complications, postoperative dysfunction and high cost composite meshes. Desarda's technique, became a new surgical option for tissue-based inguinal hernia repair. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and complications of the Desarda’s repair with Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for treatment of inguinal hernia in a developing country.

Methods: 200 patients with unilateral, primary, reducible inguinal hernia were selected. Included patients were randomly divided into two groups. Studied parameters were Duration of surgery, intra operative complications, post-operative Pain, Duration of hospital stay, return to normal activities, post-operative complications and recurrences.

Results: There were a total of 100 patients each group. There was no statistically significant difference in duration of surgery and complication rate between the two groups. Difference in mean VAS was not statistically significant. The mean hospital stay in Desarda’s technique was 2.5 days while it was 2.6 days in Lichtenstein’s group. The mean time to return to basic physical activity in the Desarda’s technique was 12.6 days while it was 13.3 days in the Lichtenstein’s group. There were no recurrences in either group. Chronic inguinal pain (>1month) was more frequent in Lichtenstein’s group.

Conclusions: There is no significant difference in duration of surgery, intra operative complication rate, post-operative pain, complications and recurrence, between Desarda’s technique and Lichtenstein’s technique. However chronic inguinal pain is less in Desarda’s technique. Desarda’s repair must be considered in young patients (<30 years). Its long-term efficacy needs to be studied with larger, prospective double-blind randomized trials, with longer follow-up.


Keywords


Desarda’s technique, Inguinal hernia repair, Lichtenstein technique

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowen JR, Thompson WR, Dorman BA, Soderberg CH, Shahinian TK. Change in the management of adult groin hernia. Am J Surg. 1977;135:564-9.

Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J epidemiol. 1996;25(4):835-9.

Situma SM. Comparison of Desarda versus modified Bassini inguinal Hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2009;14:70-6.

Szczesny W, Szopinski J, Reslinski A. Early postoperative pain after Lichtenstein and Desarda hernioplasty. Polish Surg. 2010;12:67-75.

Genc V, Ensari C, Ergul Z. A very late-onset deep infection after prosthetic inguinal hernia repair. Chirurgia. 2010;105:555-7.

Subwongcharoen S. Outcome of inguinal hernia repair. Total extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair versus open tension-free hernia repair Lichtenstein technique. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85:1100-4.

Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 2009;13:343.

Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D. Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2004;91:44-8.

Scott N, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PMNYH, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/CD002197/COLOCA_open-surgery-using-mesh-for-groin-hernia-repair. Accessed 15 December, 2017.

Schumpelick V, Klinge U. The properties and clinical effects of various types of mesh used in hernia repair. Association of Great Britain and Ireland (Yearbook). 2001.

D’Amore L, Gossetti F, Vermeil V, Negro P. Long-term discomfort after plug and patch hernioplasty. Hernia. 2008 Aug 1;12(4):445-6.

Genc V, Ensari C, Ergul Z, Kulacoglu H. A very late-onset deep infection after prosthetic inguinal hernia repair. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2010;105(4):555-7.

Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham PA, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

Jeans S, Williams GL, Stephenson BM. Migration after open mesh plug inguinal hernioplasty: a review of the literature. Am surg. 2007;73(3):207-9.

Ott V, Groebli Y, Schneider R. Late intestinal fistula formation after incisional hernia using intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia. 2005;9(1):103-4.

Benedetti M, Albertario S, Niebel T, Bianchi C, Tinozzi FP, Moglia P, Arcidiaco M, Tinozzi S. Intestinal perforation as a long-term complication of plug and mesh inguinal hernioplasty: case report. Hernia. 2005;9(1):93-5.

McRoy LL. Plugoma and the prolene hernia system. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;212:424-5.

Miller JP, Acar F, Kaimaktchiev VB, Gultekin SH, Burchiel KJ. Pathology of ilioinguinal neuropathy produced by mesh entrapment: case report and literature review. Hernia. 2008;12(2):213-6.

Fawole AS, Chaparala RPC, Ambrose NS. Fate of the inguinal hernia following removal of infected prosthetic mesh. Hernia. 2006;10:58-61.

Desarda MP. Inguinal herniorrhaphy with an undetached strip of external oblique aponeurosis: a new approach used in 400 patients. Eur J Surg. 2001;167:443-8.

Desarda MP. New method of inguinal hernia repair: a new solution. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:241-4.

Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. Lichtenstein open tension free hernioplasty. Hernia repair (Open Vslaparoscopic approaches) edited by Guy J Maddern, Jonathan RH, Edward H Philip. Publisher: Edinburgh Churchill Livingstone; 1997:117-122.

Bay-Nielson M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Danish Hernia Database.Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy nationwide study. Ann Surg. 2001;233:1-7.

Taylor SG, O'Dwyer PJ. Chronic groin sepsis following tensionfree inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg. 1999;86:562-5.

Uzzo RG, Lemack GE, Morrissey KP, Goldstein M. The effects of mesh bio prosthesis on spermatic cord structures: A preliminary report in a canine model. J Urol. 1999;161:1344-9.

Danielson P, Isacson S, Hansen MV. Randomised study of Lichtenstein compared with Shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:49-53.

Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Inguinal herniorrhaphy with an undetached strip of external oblique aponeurosis: old or new? Eur J Surg. 2001;167:877.

Losanoff JE, Millis JM. Aponeurosis instead of prosthetic mesh for inguinal hernia repair: neither physiological nor new. Hernia. 2006;10:198-9.

McArthur LL. Autoplastic suture in hernia and other diastases. JAMA. 1901;37:1162-5.

Ravitch MM, Hitzrot JM. The operations for inguinal hernia. I. Bassini, Halsted, Andrews, Ferguson. Surg. 1960;48:439-66.

Grant AM. Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia. 2002;6:130-6.

Horstmann R, Hellwig M, Classen C, Röttgermann S, Palmes D. Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes. World J Surg. 2006;30(9):1742-9.

Desarda MP. Physiological repair of inguinal hernia: a new technique (study of 860 patients). Hernia. 2006;10:143-6.

Mitura K, Romanczuk M. Comparison between two methods of inguinal hernia surgery-Lichtenstein and Desarda. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008;24:392-95.

Desarda MP and Ghosh A. Comparative Study of Open Mesh Repair and Desarda’s No-Mesh Repair in a District Hospital in India. E C A Afr J Surg. 2006;11(2):28-34.